Search Results for "Expeditious trial"

Trending :

Search Results for "Expeditious trial"

618 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 618 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Counter-Claim in Civil Suit Under Order VIII Rule 6A CPC — Rejects Trial Court's View That Counter-Claim Must Be Filed Only After Written Statement. The court held that a counter-claim can be filed after written statement but before settlement of issues, and the trial court's rejection was erroneous.

15 Jun 2026

The petitioners, Mandar Suresh Bhatwadekar and Dr. Shrirang Arun Limaye, were defendants in two civil suits (RCS/2249/2019 and RCS/2248/2019) filed by...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Application to File Written Statement Beyond Limitation in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that Order 8 Rule 1 CPC is directory and not mandatory, and that delay in filing written statement can be condoned on payment of costs if no prejudice is caused to the plaintiff.

10 Jun 2025

The petitioner, Smt. Kusuma Kumari, represented by her General Power of Attorney holder, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution o...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Conversion Case Due to Non-Compliance with Policy Conditions. Petitioner's Claim for Leasehold to Freehold Conversion Failed as Land Area and Capital Investment Did Not Meet Mandatory Requirements Under Uttar Pradesh Tourism Policy, 2013.

17 Mar 2023

The dispute arose from a writ petition filed by a company challenging the order dated 24.01.2022 issued by respondent No. 1, which rejected its propos...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Quashes Criminal Complaint in Insecticides Act Case Due to Limitation Bar. Complaint Filed Beyond Three-Year Period from Date Offence Known to Complainant, Violating Sections 468 and 469 of Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, and Alleging Misbranding Under Sections 3(k)(i), 17, 18, 29 of Insecticides Act, 1968.

4 Aug 2021

The Supreme Court of India heard a criminal appeal arising from a Special Leave Petition, where the appellants, a company and its managing director, c...

High Court

High Court of Bombay at Goa Dismisses Appeal Against SARFAESI Proceedings — Tenant's Claim Not Established. The court held that the appellant failed to prove tenancy and that the remedy under Section 17 of the Securitisation Act is available to any person aggrieved, including tenants.

14 Feb 2020

The appellant, Modinasab Indikar, filed a first appeal before the High Court of Bombay at Goa against the order of the District Magistrate, Salcete, d...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Holds Section 13(2)(a) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 is Directory — District Forum Can Extend Time for Filing Reply Beyond 45 Days in Exceptional Circumstances. The 30-day period for filing reply commences from receipt of notice by the opposite party.

1 Jan 2020

The Supreme Court Constitution Bench addressed two questions referred regarding Section 13(2)(a) of the Consumer Protection Act, 1986. The first quest...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Lack of Demand Verification and Inconsistent Evidence. Allegation of Bribe Demand Fails as Trap Witnesses Did Not Support Prosecution Case Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) r/w 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

17 Sep 2019

The State of Maharashtra appealed against the judgment and order dated 23rd October 2012 passed by the Special Judge, Kolhapur acquitting the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Common Cross-Examination in Eviction Suits to Prevent Prejudice to Tenants. Trial Court's Order Dismissing Application for Common Cross-Examination Set Aside Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

29 Aug 2019

The petitioners, tenants in four eviction suits filed by the respondent landlord society, sought common cross-examination of the society's sole witnes...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Rejection of Leave to Defend in Summary Suit for Recovery of Earnest Money Under Oral Agreement. Oral Agreement for Sale Does Not Fall Within Order 37 CPC Categories, Hence Unconditional Leave to Defend Granted.

30 Jan 2018

The respondent-plaintiff filed Special Civil Suit No.120 of 2017 before the Civil Judge Senior Division, Pune, seeking recovery of Rs.12,00,000/- (inc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Grants Bail to Accused in Immoral Trafficking Case Due to Violation of Right to Speedy Trial Under Article 21. The court held that the constitutional right to a speedy trial under Article 21 of the Constitution of India is violated when the State causes delays in framing charges, regardless of which agency is responsible.

9 Mar 2010

The applicant, Rajdev Kumar Mathura Yadav @ Pappu, filed a criminal application seeking bail in connection with C.R.No. RC 2/S/2008 registered by the ...

27 28 29 30 31

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)