Search Results for "Expeditious Enquiry"

327 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 327 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to Unexplained Delay of 169 Days. Bureaucratic Delays Not Sufficient Cause for Condonation of Delay Under Section 24A of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by the Sub Post Master, Gandhinagar, against Meenaben Bhaw...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission Dismisses Second Appeal Due to 399-Day Delay — Condonation Denied for Lack of Sufficient Cause. Internal administrative delays and employee turnover held not sufficient to explain each day of delay under Section 51 of Consumer Protection Act, 2019.

The National Consumer Disputes Redressal Commission (NCDRC) dismissed a second appeal filed by SBI General Insurance Company Ltd. against an order of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Dishonour of Cheque Cases Due to Lack of Proper Service of Demand Notice and Absence of Debt or Liability. Cheques Issued as Security for Future Transactions Do Not Attract Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The petitioners, Parth Bhadresh Mehta, Hiten Kantilal Shah, and Vishal Laxmikant Thakkar, filed Criminal Writ Petitions under Section 482 of the Code ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging SAFEMA Forfeiture Orders — Bank's Mortgage Rights Protected as Prior Encumbrance. The Court held that forfeiture under Section 7 of SAFEMA does not extinguish a prior bona fide mortgage created before the issuance of the show cause notice.

The Petitioner, Development Credit Bank Ltd., filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dated 12th Mar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Revision of Interim Injunction in Specific Performance Suit — Agreement Holder's Right to Protect Suit Property Upheld. The court restored status quo ante to prevent alienation of suit property pending final adjudication of the specific performance claim.

The appellant/plaintiff filed a suit for specific performance of an agreement to sell agricultural land dated 18.10.2000, modified on 27.2.2007, for a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Recusal Application by Advocate in Official Liquidator's Report — Advocate's Conduct Found Obstructive and Discourteous. Court Holds That Adverse Remarks Against Counsel Do Not Automatically Warrant Recusal Unless Bias Is Demonstrated.

The judgment arises from an application/praecipe filed by Advocate Mathews J. Nedumpara on 14th October 2014, requesting that Justice S.J. Kathawalla ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Partition Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal to Reject Plaint Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and Is Not Barred by Limitation or Res Judicata.

The case involves three appeals filed by the defendants (Smt. Malti Kapadia, Hemant Kapadia, and Vijaysingh Kapadia) against an order of the City Civi...