Search Results for "Criminal Trespass"

319 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 319 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 307 and 452 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Vijay Jaywant Dongare, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Khed-Rajgurunagar, Pune, for offences under Sections 307 (attempt to murder...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Attempt to Murder Case Due to Unreliable Identification and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 307 and 451 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness's testimony was inconsistent and identification of accused was doubtful.

The appellant, Dnyaneshwar Chintaram Kadam, was convicted by the Adhoc Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, for offences under Sections 451 (house tre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Appellant for Murder Based on Dying Declaration and Recovery of Weapon. Oral dying declaration made by deceased to his children immediately after assault held admissible and sufficient to convict under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Prabhakar Ambaji Bhagwat, was convicted by the 6th Additional Sessions Judge, Pune, for the murder of Lawrence Christi under Section 30...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Sole Eyewitness Testimony. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as the sole eyewitness's testimony was found to be unreliable and the prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Balu Kondiba Thengil, was convicted by the trial court for the murder of Apparao under Section 302 IPC and for house trespass under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Dacoity and Murder Case — Evidence of Eyewitnesses and Recovery of Revolver Establishes Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Accused No.1 Convicted Under Sections 396, 449, 324, and 302 IPC for Firing Fatal Shots During Robbery.

The appellant, Sahadat Hussain Rahimat Hussain @ Kaloo Kanduri, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for offences under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Rioting and Assault Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Doubtful Identification. Conviction under Sections 147, 148, 149, 307, 323, 324, 326, 504, 506 of IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves an appeal against conviction in Sessions Trial No. 544 of 1998. The appellants, Bhaurao Dangarkar and three others, were convicted f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Sections 376, 451, 506 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Anil Vithoba Shinde, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nasik, in Sessions Case No.163 of 1998 for offences punishable und...