Search Results for "Admission Restoration"

333 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 333 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Municipal Corporation Challenging Industrial Court Order on Unfair Labour Practice. Withdrawal of incentive bonus without lawful revision held to be unfair labour practice under Item 9 of Schedule IV of MRTU & PULP Act, 1971.

The Petitioner, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai through its General Manager of BEST, challenged the judgment and order dated 14 February 2008 ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Nagpur Quashes Caste Scrutiny Committee's Invalid Order and Directs Restoration of Pension in Halba Tribe Claim Case. Petitioner's Caste Certificate Invalidated Without Proper Opportunity of Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice.

The petitioner, Vinayak Marotrao Mahajan, a retired Deputy Engineer from Maharashtra Jeevan Pradhikaran, challenged the order dated 29.12.2017 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Challenge to Pledge of Shares During Lock-In Period — Pledge Held Valid as Lock-In Restricts Transfer of Title, Not Interest. Court Rules That Pledge Under Section 172 of Contract Act Does Not Violate SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2009.

The plaintiff, Kannan Vishwanath, a promoter and managing director of Dr. Datson Labs Limited, filed a suit and notice of motion seeking a declaration...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Grants Temporary Injunction in Trademark Infringement Case — 'EVANOVA' vs 'ECONOVA' for Pharmaceutical Products. Marks Held Deceptively Similar Under Section 29 of Trade Marks Act, 1999.

The Plaintiff, Charak Pharma Pvt. Ltd., filed a suit against Glenmark Pharmaceuticals Ltd. seeking a perpetual injunction restraining the Defendant fr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Petition, Upholds Ex Parte Eviction Decree Against Tenant for Subletting. Tenant's Delay in Seeking to Set Aside Decree Not Condoned as Reliance on Advocate's Assurance Without Follow-Up Does Not Constitute Sufficient Cause Under Article 123 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The petitioner, Smt. Taramati Bhagwandas Vithlani, is the owner of a chawl in Kurla, Mumbai. The first respondent was a tenant in Room No.238. The pet...