Search Results for "vacate premises"

909 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 909 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision, Discharges Applicant in PITA Case for Lack of Prima Facie Evidence of Knowledge of Brothel Use. Applicant's flat was let out on leave and license basis; no material to show applicant knew premises were used as a brothel.

The applicant, Mahesh Panjabrao Andhale, filed a Criminal Revision Application before the Bombay High Court challenging the order dated 09/02/2021 pas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Eviction Suit — Confirms Decree for Possession Based on Valid Sale Deed and Caretaker Agreement. Agreement for Sale and Subsequent Sale Deed Transfer Title; Occupier as Caretaker Must Vacate After Expiry of Term.

The respondent/plaintiff filed Regular Civil Suit No.819 of 2016 for possession and arrears of rent against the defendant, who had sold the suit prope...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition in Eviction Case for Subletting and Landlord's Bonafide Requirement. Subletting of part of premises and landlord's reasonable need for property upheld by appellate court.

The respondent, Sidaramappa Kashinath Lingshetti, is the owner and landlord of a house property bearing municipal no. 351/1/2B, city survey no. 3384/4...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Union of India's Petition Challenging CAT Order Quashing Recovery of Leave Salary. Ex-India Leave Sanctioned for MIT Course Not Subject to Recovery as Study Leave Entitlement Under Railway Rules Not Exhausted.

The Union of India and other railway officials filed a writ petition challenging the order of the Central Administrative Tribunal (CAT) dated 8 Decemb...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Decree Under Section 6 of Specific Relief Act, 1963. Suit Under Section 6 Not Maintainable Against Person Claiming Lawful Title.

The petitioners, original defendants, challenged a decree dated 18th May 1998 passed in favour of the respondents-plaintiffs under Section 6 of the Sp...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Extends Time to Vacate Suit Premises in Eviction Matter — Petitioner Granted Additional Three Months to Vacate. Court Held That Time Extension Is Permissible When Petitioner Demonstrates Need and No Prejudice Is Caused to Respondent.

The petitioner, Mrs. Kusum Kapur, had filed a writ petition which was disposed of on 23/3/2005, granting her three months' time to vacate the suit pre...