Search Results for "section 24(2)"

513 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 513 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Regular Second Appeal in Property Suit — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 100 CPC. Suit for Declaration of Title and Injunction Dismissed as Plaintiffs Failed to Prove Title and Possession Over Suit Property.

The appellants (plaintiffs) filed a Regular Second Appeal under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree of t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Gram Panchayat's Property Tax Levy on Industrial Units in KIADB Area — Property Tax Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Is Valid Despite KIADB Land Ownership.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various industrial units located in the Sompura Industrial Area, developed by the Karnataka I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Municipal Corporation's Challenge to Caste Validity Certificates — Employer Lacks Locus Standi Under Maharashtra Caste Certificate Act, 2000. Corporation Cannot Challenge Certificates Issued to Employees as Only Person Aggrieved or State Government Can Do So.

The Pimpri Chinchwad Municipal Corporation (PCMC) filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the caste validity certificates issue...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Appeal in Land Reforms Case — Upholds Land Tribunal's Order Granting Occupancy Rights to Tenant. Third Party Trust's Challenge to Tribunal's Order Dismissed as Not Maintainable Under Karnataka Land Reforms Act, 1961.

The appellant, T. Venkateshalu, filed an application in Form No.1 on 06.12.1983 before the Land Tribunal, Hosapete Taluk, claiming occupancy rights in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Vitiated Sanction and Inconsistent Evidence. Sanction under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 found to be without application of mind, and prosecution evidence on demand and acceptance of bribe was mutually inconsistent.

The appellant, Ravindra s/o Marotrao Thakre, was convicted by the Special Court under the Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 for offences under Sectio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appointment of Arbitrator in Development Dispute — Consent Terms Creating Arbitration Agreement Are Valid and Enforceable Under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. Court Appoints Substitute Arbitrator When Named Arbitrator Did Not Enter Upon Reference.

The applicant, Mohan Balkrishna Lulla, filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking appointment of an a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows SFC's Claim for Priority Over Central Excise Dues in Recovery from Borrower's Assets. State Financial Corporation's Statutory Charge Under Section 29 of SFC Act, 1951 Prevails Over Crown Debt Under Central Excise Act, 1944.

The petitioner, SICOM Ltd., a State Financial Corporation established under the State Financial Corporations Act, 1951, advanced a term loan of Rs. 51...