Search Results for "landlord's claim"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...

Search Results for "landlord's claim"

1205 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1205 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Landlords' Revision Petitions in Rent Control Eviction Cases — Bonafide Requirement Not Established. Landlords failed to prove bonafide requirement for own use and occupation under Section 27(2)(r) of the Karnataka Rent Act, 1999, as the need was for a different business and not for the landlord's own occupation.

11 Jul 2025

The case involves three revision petitions filed by landlords against a common order of the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Shivamogga (Sitt...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenant's Petition Challenging Eviction Decree — Valid Service of Demand Notice and Application of Section 12(3)(a) of Bombay Rent Act Upheld. Tenant's refusal of notice and monthly tenancy established; Appellate Court's findings not perverse.

13 Sep 2024

The petitioners, Gorakh Rambhau Chothve and Jalinder Rambhau Chothve, were defendants in a suit for eviction and arrears of rent filed by the responde...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petitions Challenging Eviction for Demolition and Reconstruction Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. The court upheld the Appellate Authority's finding that the landlord's need for reconstruction was bona fide and that the building was dilapidated, rejecting the tenants' challenge under Article 226.

4 May 2023

The case involves two writ petitions filed by tenants (Geeta Mangesh Laud and others in WP 1836/2012, and Siddhartha Fondekar in WP 1653/2012) challen...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Tenants' Petition Challenging Eviction Decree on Ground of Bonafide Need Under Maharashtra Rent Control Act, 1999. Concurrent findings of bonafide need of landlords' sons for business upheld as not perverse.

27 Jul 2022

The petitioners, tenants of a commercial premises, challenged concurrent eviction decrees passed by the Small Causes Court and the Appellate Court und...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Upholds Punjab Religious Premises Act as Valid Classification Under Article 14. Tenants of Religious Institutions Not Entitled to Rent Control Protection as Religious Property Requires Summary Eviction Procedure to Prevent Maladministration.

4 Dec 2019

The case involves an appeal by tenants occupying shops in Gurudwara Singh Sabha, Mandi Gobindgarh, Punjab, challenging the constitutional validity of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Section 14 SARFAESI Act Order for Police Aid — No Locus Standi for Borrower's Partner After Property Sold to Third Party. The Court held that once the secured asset is sold and possession handed over to the auction purchaser, the borrower or its partner has no right to challenge the Section 14 order, and the remedy lies before the DRT under Section 17 of the SARFAESI Act.

9 Oct 2015

The petitioners, M/s. National Laminate Corporation (a partnership firm) and its partner Mr. Jayantilal L. Nisar, filed a writ petition under Article ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging MRT Order in Tenancy Matter — Purchase Certificate Under Section 32M Upheld Despite Delay in Section 32F Application. The court held that the application under Section 32F of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 was barred by limitation as it was filed beyond two years from the landlord's death, and the purchase certificate under Section 32M is conclusive.

22 Jan 2015

The petitioners, claiming to be tenants of a suit property, initiated proceedings under Section 32G of the Bombay Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, ...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Allows Writ Appeal in Land Tribunal Case — Appellants Granted Opportunity to Prove Tenancy Rights. The Court set aside the Land Tribunal's order and remanded the matter for fresh consideration, holding that the Tribunal must consider all evidence and provide a reasoned order.

16 Jan 2015

The appellants, legal representatives of the original tenant, filed a writ appeal against the order of the Single Judge in W.P.No.4974/2012 dated 06/0...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Lease vs. Licence Dispute — Agreement Dated 1st March 1977 Held to Create Licence, Not Lease. Court Interprets Clauses of Agreement to Determine Intention of Parties, Finding No Transfer of Interest in Property.

28 Feb 2014

The dispute in this second appeal arises from a suit filed by the appellant, Prakash Ganesh Lotlikar, against the respondent, Joel Avelino Noronha, se...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Landlords' Writ Petitions in Tenancy Dispute, Upholds Tenants' Purchase Rights Under Bombay Tenancy Act. The heirs of a widow landlord failed to prove personal requirement for possession under Section 31 and to file a timely application under Section 32F, resulting in the tenants being declared purchasers of the agricultural land.

13 Aug 2010

The dispute arose from four tenancy applications filed in 1974 by the original landlady, Bhimabai Sitaram Bang, a widow on the tillers' day (01-04-195...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)