Search Results for "Section 364"

717 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 717 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused for Murder and Causing Disappearance of Evidence, Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal of Co-Accused. Conviction under Sections 302 and 201 IPC based on circumstantial evidence and last seen theory.

The case involves two appeals arising from the same judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Sangamner, in Sessions Case No. 27 of 2005. Criminal Ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence and Failure to Prove Identity of Deceased. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Last Seen Theory Fails and Medical Evidence Contradicts Prosecution Case.

The Supreme Court of India heard appeals against the judgment of the Gujarat High Court which had reversed the trial court's acquittal and convicted t...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Accused in Kidnapping for Ransom Case. Accused Convicted Under Sections 364-A, 363, 384, 120-B IPC for Abducting a Minor Boy and Demanding Rs. 15 Lakhs Ransom.

The case involves the abduction of a five-and-a-half-year-old boy, Atharva, from Raja Shivaji Nagar, Chinchwad, on 09/04/2010. The accused Nos. 1 and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 363, 364, and 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Dhananjay Janardhan Yadav, was convicted by the V Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the kidnapping and murder of his five-y...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005

The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging IPAB Order Refusing Additional Evidence in Trademark Opposition. Court holds that the IPAB's refusal to allow additional documents was not perverse or arbitrary, and the petitioners failed to show sufficient cause for not producing them earlier.

The petitioners, M/s. Agar Distributors (India) and Shri Siraj Amirali Soorani, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 16 July 2010 passed b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Unreliable Testimony and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 376 IPC set aside as victim's evidence was inconsistent and medical evidence did not support the prosecution case.

The appellant, Sadanand Kalya Pagi, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Palghar, for an offence punishable under Section 376 of the Indian...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Child Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 364, and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Varsha Bhimrao Rasal, was convicted by the 1st Ad-hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Karad, in Sessions Case No.8 of 2004 for the offences ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Witnesses and Lack of Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201, 364 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Shivaji Pandurang Chikane, was convicted by the II Additional Sessions Judge, Satara, for the murder of Malan Damodar Jadhav and senten...