Search Results for "Premature writ petition"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "Premature writ petition"

766 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 766 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes PMLA Proceedings Against MLA for Lack of Scheduled Offence — ECIR Initiation Without Predicate Offence Invalid. The court held that the predicate offence must be a scheduled offence under the PMLA for the ED to have jurisdiction, and quashed the ECIR and summons under Section 50 PMLA.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner, a sitting Member of the Legislative Assembly, filed a criminal petition under Section 528 of the Bharatiya Nagarik Suraksha Sanhita, 2...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging PMLA Attachment — Section 32A IBC Immunity Overrides Provisional Attachment Order Under PMLA. Resolution Plan Approved for Corporate Debtor Shields Assets from Enforcement Directorate's Attachment.

1 Mar 2024

The judgment concerns two writ petitions: one by individuals (Shiv Charan, Pushpalata Bai, and Bharti Agarwal) challenging a provisional attachment or...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Sugar Export Ban — No Fundamental Right to Export Sugar. The Court held that the Central Government's power under Section 3 of the Essential Commodities Act, 1955 to prohibit sugar exports is a valid regulatory measure and does not violate Article 19(1)(g) of the Constitution.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioners, M/S Askins Biofuels Private Limited and M/S Shri Bhramanandasagar Jaggery Industries, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 22...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Quashing of FIR in Disproportionate Assets Case Under Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988. The Court Held That a Preliminary Inquiry Is Not Mandatory Before FIR Registration and the FIR Should Not Be Quashed as It Discloses a Cognizable Offence Based on Source Information.

8 Oct 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the Telangana High Court dated 11 February 2020, which allowed a writ petition filed by the respondents under Arti...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Enquiry Committee Constitution Under Section 106 of Maharashtra Public Universities Act, 2016 as Premature. Vice Chancellor's Power to Constitute Committee Upheld Where No Stay Was Granted and Enquiry Completed.

18 Sep 2020

The petitioner, Dr. Geeta Mallikarjun Patil, a Professor and Head of the Department of English at Dr. Babasaheb Ambedkar Marathwada University, Aurang...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Municipal Corporation in MRTP Act Notice Case — Notice Under Section 89 MRTP Act Held Valid and Not Barred by Limitation. The Court set aside the trial court decree declaring the notice invalid, finding that the notice was within limitation but the suit was premature.

14 Jan 2020

The appellant, Municipal Corporation of Greater Mumbai, filed a First Appeal under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 against the oral ju...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Plaintiff to Cross-Examine Hostile Witnesses Called by Defendant in Money Suit — Section 154 of the Indian Evidence Act, 1872. The trial court's order treating DWs 3 and 4 as hostile and permitting the defendant to cross-examine them was set aside as premature and prejudicial to the plaintiff.

16 Oct 2019

The petitioner, Rajiv Vijaysarathy Rathnam, is the plaintiff in a money suit (O.S.No.1305/2013) pending before the XLI Addl. City Civil Judge, Bengalu...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Family Court Order Directing Husband to Pay Full Ad Valorem Court Fees on Claim for Recovery of Amount in Matrimonial Dispute. Court Fees Act, 1959 - Section 8 - Inquiry into Court Fees - Held that when a party claims a specific sum of money, court fees must be paid on that amount, and the court can treat an application as an inquiry under Section 8.

6 Apr 2018

The petitioner-husband, Shri Vijay Jagdish Chheda, filed a writ petition in the Bombay High Court challenging an order of the Family Court No. 2, Pune...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging SARFAESI Auction Sale Against Personal Guarantors. Alternative Remedy Under Section 17 of SARFAESI Act, 2002 Not Exhausted; Auction Sale Confirmed and Sale Certificate Issued.

25 Jan 2017

The petitioners, M/s Utkarsh Cement Sales Pvt. Ltd. and its directors/guarantors, filed two writ petitions before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Be...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Employer's Petition Challenging Labour Court Jurisdiction in Unfair Labour Practice Complaint. Cement Industry Declared Controlled Industry Under Section 2(ee) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947, but Delegation of Powers Under Section 39 Does Not Alter Appropriate Government Status.

15 Feb 2010

The petitioner, UltraTech Cement Ltd., successor to M/s. Larsen & Toubro Limited, challenged an order dated 04.01.2010 of the Labour Court, Chandrapur...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)