Search Results for "Maharashtra Relief Undertakings"

320 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 320 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Orders Central Empowered Committee to Identify Mining Leases Operating in Violation of Environmental and Forest Laws in Odisha. Court Finds Prima Facie Case of Illegal Mining and Directs Preparation of List of Defaulting Lessees for Interim Relief Under Article 32.

The writ petitions under Article 32 of the Constitution were filed by Common Cause and Prafulla Samantra, alleging rampant illegal mining in the Keonj...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Delivered Common Order in Writ Petitions Seeking FIR Registration and SIT Investigation into Alleged Cartelization in TANGEDCO Transformer Tenders. The Court Examined Allegations of Identical Bidding and Inflated Procurement Costs Causing Loss of Rs.397 Crores to Public Exchequer.

The judgment pertains to three writ petitions filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, heard analogously by the Madras High Court. The pe...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings in Matrimonial Dispute Following Foreign Divorce Decree — Abuse of Process of Law. Consent of Informant and Foreign Divorce Decree Lead to Quashing of FIR Under Sections 498-A, 406, 506 IPC.

The applicants, Rahul Vishwas Mahajan, his parents Vishwas Ramdas Mahajan and Vaishali Vishwas Mahajan, filed an application under Section 482 of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Pronounced Judgment in Writ Petition Lodging No. 3069 of 2018 Regarding Withdrawal of Electric Bus Contract. Dispute Involved Whether BEST Could Withdraw Contract Work Order Based on Note that Acceptance Was Subject to DHI Incentive Approval.

The present writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India was filed by Olectra Greentec Limited (formerly Goldstone Infratech Limited) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Promoter's Challenge to Pledge of Shares During Lock-In Period — Pledge Held Valid as Lock-In Restricts Transfer of Title, Not Interest. Court Rules That Pledge Under Section 172 of Contract Act Does Not Violate SEBI ICDR Regulations, 2009.

The plaintiff, Kannan Vishwanath, a promoter and managing director of Dr. Datson Labs Limited, filed a suit and notice of motion seeking a declaration...