Search Results for "Maharashtra Police Act, 1951"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "Maharashtra Police Act, 1951"

609 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 609 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Habeas Corpus Petition for Production of Accused in Taloja Central Prison, Declares Continued Detention Without Production Illegal Under BNSS Section 187 and Article 21. The court held that failure to produce arrested persons before Magistrate within 24 hours as mandated by Section 187 BNSS renders detention illegal and violative of Article 21.

24 Nov 2025

The petitioner, Shazaib Sabir Patel, cousin brother of Safvan Abdul Rauf Patel and Afnan Abdul Rauf Patel (Accused Nos. 2 and 3 in FIR No. 0274 of 202...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Clarifies Powers of Collector under Section 142 of Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. Court Expands the Scope of "Any Place" in Section 142(1) to Include Multiple Licensed Shops in the Interest of Public Peace.

30 Sep 2024

The Bombay High Court addressed the scope of the Collector's powers under Section 142(1) of the Maharashtra Prohibition Act, 1949. The petitioners cha...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under Goonda Act in Favor of Detenue's Wife Due to Procedural Violations. Preventive Detention Invalid for Failure to Follow Section 8 Safeguards and Provide Effective Representation Under Article 22(5).

19 Jul 2023

The writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India and Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, was filed by Smt. B...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Order Against Petitioners in Maharashtra Police Act Case — Selective Dropping of Proceedings Against Co-Accused Renders Order Unsustainable. The court held that selective externment of only two out of six alleged gang members without any reason is not permissible under law, and externment from adjoining talukas beyond the district of alleged activities is unsustainable.

29 Aug 2022

The petitioners, Mohammad Bin Saeed Bin Kileb and Saeed Bin Mohammad Bin Kileb, filed a criminal writ petition before the Bombay High Court, Bench at ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Externment Orders Against Social Workers for Lack of Material and Non-Application of Mind. Orders under Maharashtra Police Act, 1951 Section 56(1)(b) set aside as show-cause notice and externment order failed to specify prejudicial activities with sufficient clarity.

8 Mar 2022

The petitioners, Govinda Dashrath Sonawane and Mithun Dashrath Sonawane, both social workers, challenged the externment orders passed against them und...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Aurangabad Hears Letters Patent Appeal Against Dismissal of Review in Kulkarni Watan Land Regrant Case. Decides on Rights of Purchaser Versus Successors of Original Watandar Under Bombay Paragana and Kulkarni Watans (Abolition) Act, 1950.

10 Jan 2019

The dispute involved lands bearing Survey Nos. 135 and 144 at Jamda, Jalgaon, originally held as Kulkarni Watan. In 1944, the vendor Ramchandra Tembul...

High Court

High Court of Bombay Considers Challenge to Section 36(4) of Industrial Disputes Act, 1947 Restricting Legal Representation Without Consent. Employer Seeks to Quash Labour Court Order Barring Engagement of Advocate in Industrial Dispute Reference.

1 Mar 2018

The petitioner, a company engaged in manufacturing, dismissed the respondent workman for misconduct after due process in August 2015. The workman rais...

High Court

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment on Challenge to DCR 33(7) Surplus Area Surrender for Cessed Building Rehabilitation. Petitioners Contended Compulsory Acquisition Without Adequate Compensation.

7 May 2015

The group of writ petitions before the Bombay High Court challenged the constitutional validity of clause 4 of Appendix III to Regulation 33(7) of the...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition Against Denial of Public Entertainment Licence for Restaurant with Valid FLIII Licence — Parking Requirement Not a Valid Ground Under Bombay Police Act, 1951. The Court held that the only precondition for Public Entertainment Licence under Rule 3 of the Public Entertainment Rules is possession of a liquor licence, and the Commissioner cannot impose additional conditions like parking.

22 Jan 2015

The petitioner, Rajeev S. Mehta, is the sole proprietor of M/s. Senorita Bar and Restaurant, which holds various licences including an Eating House Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.

11 Dec 2006

This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)