Search Results for "District Grievance Redressal Officer"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Disposes Appeal by Consent Appointing Arbitrator in MSME Dispute, ...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...

Search Results for "District Grievance Redressal Officer"

343 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Reverses High Court's Quashing of FIR in Cross-Case Involving Assault and Wrongful Restraint - Limitation Period for Cognizance Commences from Date of Offence, Not Charge-Sheet Filing, Under Sections 468 and 469 CrPC, with Delay Condonable Under Section 473. Court Emphasizes That Negligence of Investigating Officer Should Not Benefit Accused, Especially in Cases of Cross-FIRs Arising from Same Incident.

9 Apr 2026

The dispute arose from cross-FIRs filed after an incident on 09.05.2011 involving the appellant-complainant and respondent-accused, an advocate. The a...

High Court

High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Land Acquisition Case Upholding Acquisition and Leasing for Public Purpose. Acquisition Completed Under Land Acquisition Act, 1894 with Possession Taken in 2000, and 2013 Act Not Applicable Retrospectively, While Government Resolutions on Plot Allotment Do Not Apply After Ownership Extinguished.

9 Mar 2026

The dispute involved petitioners challenging the acquisition of 25.39 acres of their land in Survey No.210, Village Wakad, Pune, for a new town develo...

Supreme Court

Article 227 Cannot Override Order VII Rule 11 CPC | Supreme Court Restores Plaint Wrongly Struck Off by High Court (2026 INSC 121)

3 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court held that the High Court erred in striking off the plaint under Article 227 of the Constitution when a specific remedy under Order V...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes FIR in Abetment of Suicide Case Against Company Executives — No Proximate Link Between Alleged Acts and Suicide Established. Court holds that mere issuance of show-cause notice or termination of employment does not constitute abetment of suicide under Section 306 IPC without evidence of direct instigation or active participation.

28 Jul 2023

The petitioners, employees of Lifestyle International Private Limited, sought quashing of FIR No. 151/2023 registered at Whitefield Police Station for...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Transfer Order for Lack of Prior Approval Based on Recorded Reasons. Chief Minister's Discretion Under Para 9(b) of Government Order No.DPAR 22 STR 2013 is Not Absolute.

13 Nov 2018

The petitioner, Sri Rajashekar M., an Extension Officer in the Department of Backward Classes Welfare, challenged an order dated 25.09.2018 passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Police Officer in Private Complaint for Assault — Lack of Sanction Under Section 197 CrPC Renders Prosecution Invalid. Proceedings under Sections 326, 504, 506(II) and 34 IPC quashed as mandatory sanction for public servant not obtained.

14 Dec 2015

The applicant, Manoj Prabhakar Lohar, an Additional Deputy Commissioner of Police in the State Intelligence Department, Mumbai, filed an application u...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition by Executive Engineer Challenging Labour Court's Reinstatement Order in Unfair Labour Practice Case. The Court upheld the Labour Court's finding that the workman had proved continuous service of 240 days and the termination was illegal, rejecting the employer's plea of delay and laches.

1 Aug 2014

The petitioner, Executive Engineer, Public Works Division, Wardha, challenged the Judgment and Award dated 9.6.2005 passed by the Labour Court, Wardha...

High Court

Karnataka High Court Dismisses Habeas Corpus Petition for Missing Husband — No Custodial Detention Found. Court holds that habeas corpus is not maintainable when the alleged detenu is not in police custody and his whereabouts are unknown.

24 Apr 2014

The petitioner, Usharani, filed a writ of habeas corpus under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India seeking a direction to the police auth...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Alleging Misuse of Public Funds by Educational Trust and Trustees — No Prima Facie Case of Mala Fides or Violation of Government Resolutions Established. The court held that the petitioner failed to provide specific evidence of diversion of fees or misappropriation, and the trust had complied with the fee regulation committee's directions under the Government Resolution dated 24-09-2003.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Shri Balasaheb Baburao Jambulkar, an ex-freedom fighter and social worker, filed a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) under Article 226 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Electricity Theft Assessment Orders — Lack of Proper Hearing and Violation of Natural Justice. Assessment under Section 126 of Electricity Act, 2003 set aside due to failure to provide adequate opportunity to the consumer.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioners, Maharashtra State Electricity Distribution Company Ltd., filed two writ petitions challenging assessment orders passed by the Superin...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)