Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "CPC amendment 1976"

456 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 456 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Concurrent Findings of Courts Below. Court holds that a co-owner in possession of joint family property cannot claim adverse possession against other co-owners unless there is ouster or denial of title.

27 Sep 2022

The case involves a second appeal filed by the legal heirs of the original defendant No.1 (since deceased) against the judgment and decree dated 01.10...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Perpetual Injunction Suit — Upholds Concurrent Findings on Common Well Usage. The court held that the well in Block No.35 was common to all brothers and the defendant could not obstruct plaintiffs from using it, based on oral and documentary evidence.

28 Feb 2019

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant, Ashok Vishwanath Dange, challenging the judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil App...

High Court

Bombay High Court Hears Preliminary Issue on Jurisdiction Over Originating Summons in Lease Dispute Where Defendant Has Filed Separate Eviction Suit. The Court Examines Whether the Filing of a Suit Under Section 41 of the Presidency Small Cause Courts Act, 1882, After the Originating Summons Ousts the High Court's Jurisdiction.

29 Apr 2014

This case involved a dispute between Century Textiles and Industries Ltd. (plaintiff) and Nusli Neville Wadia (defendant) arising out of a 999-year le...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Suit — Upholds Trial Court's Refusal of Temporary Injunction for Lack of Prima Facie Case and Balance of Convenience. The court held that the appellants failed to establish a prima facie case for injunction under Order 39 Rules 1 and 2 CPC as the property was in the name of the respondent and no joint ownership was proved.

30 Nov -0001

The appellants, Smt. Vishankumari Udaysingh Varma and Smt. Manju Udaysingh Varma, filed First Appeal No.627 of 2016 in the Bombay High Court against t...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Limitation Dispute, Remands Suit for Trial on Merits. Issue of limitation cannot be decided as preliminary issue under Order XIV Rule 2 CPC when facts are disputed and require evidence.

14 Feb 2022

The appellant, M/s Mongia Realty and Buildwell Private Limited, instituted a suit against the respondent, Manik Sethi, on 31 March 2017 under Order 37...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Appellate Order in Leave and License Dispute — Interim Relief Granted to Licensee Pending Suit. The court held that the licensee had a prima facie case and balance of convenience in its favour, and the license was irrevocable under Section 60(b) of the Indian Easements Act, 1882.

22 Dec 2023

The petitioner, Wework India Management Private Limited, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order dat...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal by Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India in Jurisdictional Dispute Over Trial of IBC Offences. Held that Reference to Special Court under Chapter XXVIII of Companies Act, 2013 in Section 236(1) IBC is Legislation by Incorporation, Not Affected by Subsequent Amendment.

29 Apr 2024

The appeal arises from a challenge by the Insolvency and Bankruptcy Board of India (IBBI) against the judgment of the Bombay High Court quashing the o...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petitions Challenging Execution Court Order in Suit for Specific Performance - Decree Holder's Application for Possession Through Commissioner Dismissed as Executing Court Cannot Go Beyond Decree. Executing Court Cannot Order Delivery of Possession When Decree for Specific Performance Does Not Specifically Direct Possession Under Order 21 Rule 35 CPC.

30 Jul 2015

The petitioners, legal representatives of the original plaintiff N.H. Shivamurthy, filed writ petitions under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Review Petition in Property Dispute — Second Appeal Under Section 41 of Punjab Courts Act, 1918 Does Not Require Substantial Question of Law. The Court restored the High Court's judgment after finding that the original judgment erroneously applied Section 100 CPC instead of Section 41 of the Punjab Act.

16 May 2024

The petitioner filed a review petition seeking review of an order dated 13.03.2019 in Civil Appeal No. 6567 of 2014, wherein the Supreme Court had all...

High Court

Court Upholds Executing Court's Decision, Rejects Jurisdictional Objections and Abuse of Process. Possession warrant stands as Appellate Bench's reversal deemed erroneous; Writ Petition allowed, reinforcing res judicata and legal precedents.

9 Jul 2024

The Executing Court had issued a possession warrant on 19 April 2024, which Respondent No. 1 failed to challenge. Respondent No. 1's subsequent object...

26 27 28 29 30

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)