Search Results for "preventive detention"

901 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 901 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere criminal antecedents insufficient to justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Amit alias Montu Malyo S/o. Anadibhai Behera, through his mother Rashmita Anadibhai Behera, challenged the legality and validity of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not constitute disturbance to public order.

The petitioner, Karansinh Punamsinh Parmar (detenue), challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detention order dated 08.01.2026 passed by ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish threat to public order.

The petitioner, Irfan @ Nadi S/O Ramzan Shaikh, through his mother Bilkisbanu Ramzan Shaikh, challenged the preventive detention order dated 31/12/202...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of impact on public order.

The petitioner, Arjun S/o Ganeshbhai Yadav, was preventively detained by the Commissioner of Police, Surat City, vide order dated 22.12.2025, under th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Sumit @ Bali Vikrambhai Chunara, through his uncle Anil Dipakbhai Chunara, challenged the legality and validity of a preventive detent...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance of Public Order. Mere Registration of FIRs Does Not Justify Detention Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985.

The petitioner, Jayraj @ Buddho Amrutbhai Popatbhai Dabhi, challenged the preventive detention order dated 16.12.2025 passed by the Police Commissione...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Linking Detenue's Activities to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance of public order.

The petitioner, Dinesh Gagubhai Makwana (Ahir), through his brother Dhiraj Gagubhai Makwana (Ahir), challenged the legality and validity of a preventi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Failure to Consider Bail Order and Supply Documents Violates Right to Representation.

The petitioner, Vishal Manik Dambe, challenged a preventive detention order dated 11th May 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Beed under Section ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Non-Application of Mind. Detention order set aside as the detaining authority failed to consider the petitioner's bail status and relied on stale material.

The petitioner, Asif Shaikh, challenged an order dated 22nd June 2023 passed by the Commissioner of Police, Mumbai, detaining him under Section 3(2) o...