Search Results for "mesne profits"

544 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 544 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Partition Suit. Petitioner Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Having Knowledge of Proceedings and Filing Written Statement.

The petitioner, Smt. Sokkamma (since deceased, represented by her LR M. Byrappa), filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision in Eviction Suit Between Sisters — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With Under Section 115 CPC. Ownership of Suit Property Vested in Plaintiff as Title Holder, and Defendants Failed to Prove Benami Transaction or License.

The case involves a dispute between two sisters over a residential property in Mumbai. The plaintiff, Vishala Bokapatna Laxman, filed a suit for evict...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Eviction Decree in Landlord-Tenant Dispute. Concurrent findings of default in payment of rent and subletting without consent upheld under Section 108 of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 and Order 20 Rule 12 CPC.

The petitioners, Orbit Super Market Private Limited and the legal heirs of Dr. Shrikant Jichkar, challenged concurrent orders of the trial court and a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Concurrent Findings of Fact Not Interfered With. Suit for possession based on title and prior possession; appellate court refused to re-appreciate evidence in second appeal under Section 100 CPC.

The present second appeal was filed by the original defendant No.1 challenging the judgment and decree passed in Regular Civil Appeal No.238 of 1987 b...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Petition of Licensor in Eviction Suit — Trial Court Must Consider Application for Deposit of Licence Fee Under Order 15-A CPC. Failure to Consider Order 15-A CPC Constitutes Material Irregularity Warranting Interference Under Article 227 of Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Mrs. Philomena D' Souza, through her attorney holder, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 12.03.2012 passed by the learne...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitral Award in Family Property Dispute. Arbitrator's findings on possession and tenancy rights upheld as not patently illegal under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioners, Anil Sital Hansrajani and another, who are brothers and sons of the respondent Sital T. Hansrajani, filed a petition under Section 34...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revision Against Order Refusing to Strike Out Defence in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held That Denial of Title by Tenant Without Supporting Evidence Does Not Attract Striking Out of Defence Under Order 15A CPC.

The case arises from a civil revision application filed by the defendants (M/s. Keshavdas Hassanand and others) against an order of the Trial Court re...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Property Dispute — Finds Concurrent Findings Not Perverse. The Court held that the compromise decree in earlier suit operated as res judicata and that the defendants failed to prove adverse possession.

The case involves a second appeal filed by the defendants-appellants against the judgment and decree of the District Judge, Solapur, confirming the de...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Suit for Possession and Mesne Profits — Held that the Trial Court Erred in Dismissing Suit for Non-Prosecution Without Considering Merits and That the Suit Was Not Abated Despite Death of Sole Proprietor as Legal Representatives Were Brought on Record.

The present appeal arises from a suit filed in 1983 by the original plaintiffs (respondents herein) against the original defendant, Bitesh Hanumantrao...