GULFISHA FATIMA
1 Jan 1970The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...
Search Results for "investigation delay"
3310 result(s) found
Found 3310 result(s)
High Court
Karnataka High Court Decides Bail Appeals in SC/ST Act Case; Accused Allegedly Involved in Mob Attack on MLA's House. High Court Assesses Prima Facie Case Under Sections 3(2)(v) of SC/ST Act and IPC Sections 435, 436 for Arson and Conspiracy.
22 Jun 2021The appellants, accused in Crime No. 219/2020 registered by Devarajeevanahalli Police Station, filed appeals under Section 14A(2) of the Scheduled Cas...
- 35
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeals by Police Officers and Complainant in FIR Quash Case — Sets Aside Single Judge Order Restoring Investigation. Court holds that inherent power to quash FIR under Section 482 CrPC must be exercised sparingly and only to prevent abuse of process, not to conduct a mini-trial.
28 Mar 2025The case involves two writ appeals arising from a common order of a learned Single Judge of the Karnataka High Court dated 30.03.2022 in Writ Petition...
- 44
High Court
High Court of Bombay at Goa Considers State's Appeal Against Acquittal of Three Accused in Murder by Drowning. The trial court had acquitted the accused after finding that the prosecution failed to prove the identity of the dead body as the victim and the chain of circumstantial evidence linking them to offences under Sections 302, 364, 201 and 120B of the Indian Penal Code, 1860.
14 Nov 2014This is a criminal appeal by the State of Goa against the judgment and order dated 20.02.2013 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge-1, South Goa, Ma...
High Court
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape and Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Conviction under Sections 376 and 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.
10 Sep 2020The appellant, Sakharam Sitaram Bhise, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Hingoli in Sessions Trial Case No. 72/2010 for offences punisha...
- 48
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Restores Conviction in Murder Case Based on Child Witness and Circumstantial Evidence. Section 106 of Evidence Act Shifts Burden on Husband for Wife's Death in Matrimonial Home.
3 Mar 2025The State of Madhya Pradesh appealed against the acquittal of Balveer Singh by the High Court of Madhya Pradesh. The case involved the murder of Biren...
- 1753
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes FIR and Final Report in Bio-Diesel Seizure Case — Essential Commodities Act Not Attracted. The court held that bio-diesel is not an essential commodity under the Essential Commodities Act, 1955, nor a petroleum product under the Petroleum Act, 1934, and quashed proceedings under Section 482 CrPC.
8 Sep 2023The case involves two criminal applications filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.1203 of 2021 d...
- 79
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302, 201, 34 IPC in Dismemberment Murder Case. Accused Challenge Life Imprisonment Contending Weak Circumstantial Evidence and Tutored Witnesses.
1 Aug 2026The case involved the brutal murder and dismemberment of Archideb Bhattacharjee in 2003 after he refused to pay an extortion demand of Rs.40,000 to th...
- 50
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction for Murder and Abduction in Saravana Bhavan Case — Motive of Accused No.1 to Eliminate Husband for Marriage with PW1 Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Circumstantial evidence including last seen and recovery of dead body based on confession established guilt under Sections 302, 364, 201 IPC.
29 Mar 2019The case involves the abduction and murder of Santhakumar, husband of PW1 (Jeevajothi), by Accused No.1 (proprietor of Saravana Bhavan hotels) and his...
- 227
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Bail in Elgar Parishad Case: High Court Erred in Remanding Bail Application Without Considering Merits Despite Supplementary Chargesheet. The Court held that the High Court must consider the entire material, including supplementary chargesheet, while exercising its bail jurisdiction under Section 439 CrPC, and the bar under Section 43-D(5) of the Unlawful Activities (Prevention) Act, 1967 requires a prima facie assessment of the accusation.
15 Apr 2024The appellant, Shoma Kanti Sen, was arrested on 06.06.2018 in connection with FIR No. 04/2018 registered at Vishrambaug Police Station, Pune, alleging...
- 413
