Search Results for "family burning"

355 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 355 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Husband in Dowry Death Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations and Lack of Evidence. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Were Undated, Not Read Over, and Recorded in Marathi While Deceased Knew Only Urdu.

The appellant, Mohammad Ejaz, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad, for offences under Sections 498-A (cruelty by husband) and 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declarations and Lack of Corroboration. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Dying Declarations Contained Interpolations and Child Witness Was Tutored.

The appellant, Vijay Sahebrao Patil, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner, for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC. The pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Dowry Death and Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Sections 302, 498-A IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Chandrakant Vishwanath Solas, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 10.07.2017 in Sessions Case No.32/2015 for ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellant in Murder and Dowry Death Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC set aside as dying declarations were contradictory and not supported by medical evidence.

The appellant, Sk. Javed Sk. Gulam Rasul, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Aurangabad on 22nd November 2016 in Sessions Case No.162 of ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Dying Declarations. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as multiple dying declarations contained contradictions and were not corroborated by independent witnesses or medical evidence.

The appellant, Balaji @ Balu Whitener Solanke, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded for the murder of Arun Dilip Sonkamble under Section 302 IP...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeal Against Conviction Under Section 302 IPC for Murder by Setting Wife on Fire. Inconsistent Dying Declarations and Suicide Defense Raised.

The appeal arose from the judgment dated 16 May 2013 by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar, in Sessions Case No. 235 of 2011, convicting the ap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Death Sentence Confirmation in Wife-Murder and Dowry Harassment Case. Conviction Under Sections 302, 498A, 506/34 IPC Challenged by Accused Husband and In-Laws; Allegations of Dowry Demand and Murder by Throat-Slitting.

These matters arose from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Dhule in Sessions Case No. 182 of 2014, where accused No. 1, Nitin Balkisan Ga...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Appellants in Kidnapping and Murder Case Due to Insufficient Evidence. Conviction under Sections 364-A, 302, and 201 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to a criminal appeal filed by Purushotham and Manjunatha (appellants) against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Rai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Four Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Motive and Inconsistent Evidence. Conviction under Sections 302, 201 r/w 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, four individuals, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ambajogai for the murder of Ram Baburao Masal under Section 302 IPC...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Examines Appeals Concerning Kudankulam Nuclear Power Plant, Addressing Safety and Regulatory Measures Under Atomic Energy Act, 1962. The Court Deliberates on Balancing National Energy Policy with Public Apprehensions Stemming from Past Nuclear Incidents.

The case centers on appeals related to the establishment of a nuclear power plant at Kudankulam in Tamil Nadu. The judgment begins by acknowledging th...