Search Results for "defence under Section 313 CrPC"

407 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 407 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witness and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and acceptance of bribe not proved beyond reasonable doubt under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat appealed against the acquittal of Jethabhai Manjibhai Hadiyal, a Talati-cum-Mantri, from charges under Sections 7, 13(1)(d) and 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Gang Rape and Robbery Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Independent Witnesses. Conviction under Section 376(D) IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The case pertains to two criminal appeals filed by A1 and A2 (out of three accused) challenging their conviction and sentence by the Sessions Judge, M...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal Against Conviction in Unlawful Activities Case — Appellant Convicted for Criminal Conspiracy and Unlawful Activities. The Court upheld the conviction under Section 120B IPC and Sections 10(a)(i), 10(a)(iv), 38(1) of UAP Act, finding no perversity in concurrent findings.

The appellant was arraigned as an accused in FIR Crime No. 1 of 2015 registered at Q Branch Police Station, Ramanathapuram, Tamil Nadu, for offences p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Criminal Appeal in Murder Case by Modifying Conviction of One Accused from Section 302 to Section 304 Part II IPC. Conviction of Three Accused Under Section 302 read with Section 34 IPC Confirmed Based on Consistent Eyewitness Testimonies Establishing Common Intention.

The criminal appeal arose from the concurrent conviction of four accused under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860, for th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Convicted Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence. Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt, Conviction under Sections 302 and 498A IPC Set Aside.

The appellant, Venkateshanaika, was convicted by the II Additional District and Sessions Judge, Davanagere in S.C. No. 164/2015 for offences punishabl...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Assault and Wrongful Confinement Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Sections 324 and 342 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Puttasiddamma @ Puttasiddi and Samandaiah, were convicted by the I-Addl. District and Sessions Judge, Mandya in S.C.No.50/2013 for off...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for throttling wife set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Raju Dayal Shrimali @ Khimji, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Thane for the murder of his wife under Section 302 IPC and sentenced...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Dying Declaration and Incomplete Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC for alleged bride burning set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Sanjay Vitthal Pachaghare, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amravati, for the murder of his wife Vandana under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Confirms Death Sentence for Nine Accused in Murder Case Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Court Upholds Conviction Under Section 302 IPC Read with Section 149 IPC for Brutal Murder of Five Persons Over Land Dispute.

The High Court of Karnataka at Dharwad, comprising Dr. Justice K. Bhakthavatsala and Mr. Justice B. Sreenivase Gowda, delivered a judgment on 29 Janua...