Search Results for "condonation of delay"

620 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 620 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Land Dispute and Teacher Recruitment Cases — Upholds Single Judge's Orders on Limitation and Selection Process. In LPA No.177/2012, appeal dismissed as barred by limitation; in LPA No.288/2011, selection of respondent upheld as per rules.

The judgment comprises two Letters Patent Appeals. LPA No.177/2012 arises from a land dispute where the appellants challenged an order of a Single Jud...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Eviction Order Due to Unexplained Delay of 946 Days in Filing Statutory Appeal Under Public Premises (Eviction of Unauthorized Occupants) Act, 1971. Condonation of Delay Denied as Appellant Failed to Prove Sufficient Cause for Delay.

The appellant, Rajabhau Shivram Parale, was allotted Plot No. 8 at Great Nag Road, Nagpur on licence by the Central Railway for commercial purposes. O...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Second Appeal in Specific Performance Suit — Upholds Rejection of Delay Condonation for Filing Appeal Against Ex Parte Decree. Delay of Over 2 Years in Filing Regular Civil Appeal Not Sufficiently Explained, No Sufficient Cause Shown Under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The respondent (original plaintiff) filed Regular Civil Suit No. 140/1997 for specific performance of contract against the appellant (original defenda...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Condonation of Delay in Filing Written Statement in Commercial Suit. Pendency of Application Under Section 8 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Constitutes Sufficient Cause for Delay Beyond 120 Days Under Section 16 of Commercial Courts Act, 2015.

The petitioners, M/s S.S. Nikade and Company (JV), a registered firm, filed a commercial suit on 02.02.2017 before the Commercial Court, Yavatmal, cla...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Additional Documents in Arbitration Petition Despite Delay, Subject to Costs — Charge-Sheet Filed Against Contractor Relevant to Dispute Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The judgment concerns two notices of motion filed in pending commercial arbitration petitions under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in RERA Case Due to Invalid Tribunal Composition. Sole Administrative Member Cannot Decide Condonation Application Under Section 43(3) of Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016.

The appellant, Man Global Limited, filed two second appeals under Section 58 of the Real Estate (Regulation and Development) Act, 2016 (RERA) challeng...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Employment After 12-Year Delay — Laches and Delay Bar Relief Under Article 227. Petitioner's claim for reinstatement based on interview call letters from 2000 and 2004 rejected as grossly delayed and lacking merit.

The petitioner, Gopal Yashwantrao Bangadkar, filed a writ petition under Article 227 of the Constitution of India challenging an order of the Industri...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Husband's Revision Against Ex Parte Maintenance Order Under Section 125 CrPC. Service by Refusal of Registered Post Constitutes Sufficient Service Under Section 27 of General Clauses Act, 1897.

The case involves a criminal revision application filed by the husband, Vijay Bhairavnath Joshi, against the order of the Family Court dismissing his ...