Search Results for "commercial arbitration application"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "commercial arbitration application"

992 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 992 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Challenge to Enforcement of Foreign Award on Grounds of Arbitrator Bias — Upholds High Court Order. Alleged Conflict of Interest of Presiding Arbitrator Not Sufficient to Refuse Enforcement Under Section 48(2)(b) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Mar 2024

The Supreme Court dismissed appeals challenging the enforcement of a foreign arbitral award. The dispute arose from a Share Subscription Agreement bet...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Appeal in Commercial Arbitration Dispute Over Supply of Gloves — Restores Arbitral Award with 18% Interest. The Commercial Court's interference with the arbitral award on interest rate and remand for quantification was beyond the scope of Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

5 Oct 2023

The appeal arises from a commercial dispute between M/s Ethix Alloy (appellant) and HLL Lifecare Limited (respondent) concerning a contract for the su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Commercial Arbitration Application Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Loan Agreement Contains Valid Arbitration Clause. Court Appoints Sole Arbitrator to Adjudicate Dispute Over Unpaid Loan Amount of Rs. 1,50,00,000.

28 Jul 2023

The applicant, Aditya Birla Finance Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Section 11 Application for Appointment of Arbitrator in Media Agency Contract Dispute. Rejects Limitation Objection as Not Ex-Facie Time-Barred, Holding That Limitation Is a Mixed Question of Fact and Law to Be Decided by the Arbitrator.

9 Jan 2023

The applicant, TLG India Pvt. Ltd., filed an application under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking appointment of a sole...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Civil Appeal in MSMED Act Dispute Over Facilitation Council's Order. Dispute Involved Whether Rejection Order by Council Constitutes an Award Under Section 18 of Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 2006, Affecting Remedy Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

23 Sep 2021

The dispute originated from a commercial transaction where the respondent, a supplier under the Micro Small and Medium Enterprises Development Act, 20...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Transfer of Arbitration Petition to District Court Nashik Under Section 42 of Arbitration Act — Prior Section 9 Petition Determines Exclusive Jurisdiction. The court held that the District Court at Nashik, having first entertained a Section 9 petition, has exclusive jurisdiction over all subsequent applications, including a Section 34 petition, despite a later Section 11 application before the High Court.

15 May 2020

The case involves a dispute between Microvision Technologies Pvt. Ltd. (the applicant/petitioner) and the Union of India (the respondent) arising from...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Arbitration Appointment Case — No Interference Under Article 136. Court Clarifies Scope of Section 11(6A) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Prior to Its Omission by 2019 Amendment.

5 Sep 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a civil appeal arising from a Special Leave Petition against a High Court decision refusing to appoint an arbitrator under...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in MoU Dispute Over Flat Area — Petitioner's Obligation to Sell 1 Lac Sq. Ft. Upheld. Arbitrator's Plausible Interpretation of Contract Not Interfered With Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

4 Jan 2019

The Bombay High Court dismissed an arbitration petition filed by The Bombay Dyeing And Manufacturing Co. Ltd. challenging an arbitral award passed by ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitral Award in Charter Party Demurrage Dispute — Upholds Arbitrator's Interpretation of Laytime and Demurrage Clauses. Court holds that Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not permit reappreciation of evidence or correction of errors of law unless award is patently illegal or perverse.

15 Jul 2011

The petitioners, M/s. Puyvast Chartering B.V. (owner) and M/s. Puyvast Maritime India Ltd. (agent), challenged an arbitral award dated 28 February 200...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Arbitrator's Procedural Order in Arbitration Proceeding. Section 9 or Section 19 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 Cannot Be Invoked to Challenge Arbitrator's Communication Regarding Procedure.

28 Mar 2011

The petitioner, Sahyadri Earthmovers, filed an Arbitration Petition under Section 9 read with Section 19 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996...

25 26 27 28 29

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)