Search Results for "circumstantial evidence"

3840 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3840 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder and Cruelty to Pregnant Wife — Life Imprisonment Maintained. Circumstantial Evidence Including Motive, Last Seen, and Recovery of Weapon Proved Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 302, 498-A, and 316 IPC.

The appellant, Laxman s/o Vasanta Dhotre alias Hanmantu Mhaisappa Kalkutkar, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Nanded in Sessions Case No.81 of 201...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Imprisonment for Murder of Wife Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC confirmed as chain of circumstances including homicidal death, broken mangalsutra, torn clothes, and false explanation by husband established guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellant, Shahejad Umar Shaikh, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of his wife Ayesha. The prosecution case was based on circumst...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Ashok Sudam Dhonge, was convicted by the 2nd Ad-Hoc Additional Sessions Judge, Malegaon, for the murder of his wife Chhayabai under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence and Motive. Neck injuries and recovery of incriminating articles from appellant's house established homicidal death and guilt under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Mohandas Balkrishna Jadhav, was convicted by the Sessions Judge, Ratnagiri, for the murder of his wife Manjusha under Section 302 IPC a...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband and In-Laws for Murder and Cruelty in Dowry Death Case. Appellants convicted under Sections 302 and 498-A IPC for setting deceased on fire due to dowry demands.

The case pertains to the murder of Geeta @ Laxmi Ramesh Devendra, who was set on fire by her husband (appellant no.1), brother-in-law (appellant no.2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction for Murder Based on Circumstantial Evidence. Recovery of Blood-Stained Axe and Clothes, Motive, and Last Seen Evidence Sufficient to Sustain Conviction Under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Pintu @ Arjun Suraji Suryavanshi, was convicted under Section 302 IPC for the murder of Suresh Gavandi and sentenced to life imprisonme...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Husband for Murder of Wife in Dowry Demand Case. Circumstantial evidence including demand of Rs. 50,000 for auto rickshaw and cruelty led to conviction under Section 302 IPC.

The appellant, Balaji Maruti Londhe, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Latur, for the murder of his wife Ranjana under Section 302 of th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Uxoricide Case Due to Lack of Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Dipchand Pawar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Amalner for the murder of his wife Kalpanabai under Section 302 IPC and...