Search Results for "belated reply"

534 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 534 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging Industrial Court's Reversal of Labour Court's Part-I Judgment on Enquiry Fairness. Enquiry Officer Cannot Be Examined as Witness by Management to Prove Fairness of Domestic Enquiry.

The petitioner, Baba Pandit Ghodake, challenged his termination dated 13/12/2010 w.e.f. 15/12/2010 by the respondent society, Pargaon Sudrik Vividh Ka...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Upholds Arbitral Award in Railway Contract Dispute — Interest Rate Reduced from 18% to 9%. The court held that the arbitrator's award did not violate public policy but reduced the interest rate as excessive under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

The petitioner, Union of India, challenged an arbitral award dated 8 October 2010 under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Admits Winding Up Petition Against Syrma Technology Pvt. Ltd. for Non-Payment of Admitted Debt Despite Insurance Payment. Court holds that receipt of insurance proceeds does not extinguish the debt or bar winding up proceedings under the Companies Act, 1956.

The petitioner, Jiangsu Skyrun Wuxi Co. Ltd., filed a company petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 seeking winding up of Syrma Tec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition of Teacher Seeking Pay Scale Revision and Pension Benefits. Petitioner's service as Assistant Teacher from 1972 to 1998 entitled to benefits under 5th Pay Commission and pension scheme.

The petitioner, Babulal Rama Thakre, was employed as an Assistant Teacher with Respondent No. 4, a secondary school, from 1972 until his retirement in...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Order Requiring Proof of Will Under Section 68 of Evidence Act. Admission of Contents in Plaint Does Not Dispense with Examination of Attesting Witnesses for Proving Execution of Will.

The petitioner, original defendant No.1, challenged an order dated 12.9.2012 passed by the 6th Joint Civil Judge, Junior Division, Nashik, in a suit f...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Specific Performance Suit — Appellants Failed to Show Sufficient Cause for Non-Appearance Despite Service of Summons.

The case arises from a suit for specific performance of a contract filed by the respondent/plaintiff against the appellants/defendants. The trial cour...