Search Results for "Security Guidelines"

1011 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1011 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Second Appeals in Bank Suit Rejection Case — Plaint Rejected Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC for Non-Disclosure of Cause of Action. Appellant's Suits for Declaration and Injunction Against Bank's Auction Notice Held Barred by Limitation and Lack of Cause of Action.

The appellant, Yashavant S/o Laxman Sable, filed a series of Regular Second Appeals under Section 100 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908 (CPC) again...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay Disposes Cross Appeals from Trial Court's Injunction Order in Suit for Demolition and CRZ Declaration; Construction in CRZ Not Entitled to Completion Certificate Though Demolition Restrained When Built Per Sanctioned Plan.

The dispute arose from a notice dated 7th February 1998 issued by the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay under Section 354A of the Mumbai Municip...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Criminal Proceedings Against Directors and Officers in Cheque Dishonour Case Due to Absence of Specific Allegations. Vicarious Liability Under Section 138 of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Requires Specific Averments of Role in Issuance of Cheque.

The petitioners, including M/s. GIC Housing Finance Ltd. and its directors/officers, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Upholds Section 10(26AAA) of Income Tax Act, 1961 in Sikkim Tax Exemption Challenge. Gender-Based Proviso Denying Exemption to Sikkimese Women Marrying Non-Sikkimese Struck Down as Unconstitutional.

The judgment concerns a writ petition under Article 32 challenging the constitutional validity of Section 10(26AAA) of the Income Tax Act, 1961, which...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Metro Fare Hike; Judicial Review Not Permitted Over Specialist Committee's Decision Under Metro Act. Fare Fixation Committee's Determination Based on Section 34 Prevails Over Contractual Fare Stipulations, Limited to Checking Arbitrariness or Perversity.

The writ petition challenged the Fare Fixation Committee's decision to increase Mumbai Metro fares from Rs.9-13 to Rs.10-110 from January 2015. The pe...