Search Results for "RFA"

372 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 372 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partially Allows Landowners in Land Acquisition Appeal by Modifying Deduction for Terrorism Shadow. High Court's Additional 25% Cut for Terrorism Shadow Set Aside as Market Value Already Reflects Depressed Prices Under Section 4 of Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The dispute arose from land acquisition proceedings initiated by the State of Punjab under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, via a notifica...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Partition Suit, Upholds Finding That Properties Were Self-Acquired by Sons, Not Benami. Benami Transactions (Prohibition) Act, 1988 Held Retroactive, Barring Claim Based on Benami Nature.

The present appeal arises from a partition suit filed by Smt. P. Leelavathi (since deceased, represented by legal heirs) against her brothers, the ori...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Corrects Arithmetical Errors in Land Acquisition Compensation Judgment but Refuses Recall. The Court modified compensation figures due to calculation mistakes but upheld the methodology and rejected the prayer for recall of the judgment.

The Supreme Court dealt with applications for recall of its judgment dated 11.01.2019 in Wazir and Another vs. State of Haryana, which had determined ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Remits Land Compensation Case for Fresh Consideration on Deduction from Market Value. The Court set aside the High Court's judgment and directed re-evaluation of the 60% deduction applied to the market value derived from a small land sale deed under the Land Acquisition Act, 1894.

The Supreme Court dealt with appeals arising from land acquisition proceedings initiated under Section 4 of the Land Acquisition Act, 1894, for the Hi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Indigent Person Case — Dismissal of Application Under Order 33 CPC Not a Bar for Filing Appeal Under Order 44 CPC. The Court held that the appellate court must conduct a fresh inquiry into the applicant's indigent status at the appellate stage under Order 44 Rule 3 CPC.

The appellant, Sushil Thomas Abraham, filed a civil suit for recovery of Rs.74,66,107/- as an indigent person under Order 33 Rule 1 CPC, claiming inab...