ARBITRATION PETITION (L) NO.15468 OF 2026
17 Jul 2026The petitioner, Polestar Realtors Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 9 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 seeking interim reli...
Search Results for "Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act"
1098 result(s) found
Found 1098 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Seeking Quashment of MPID Act Charges Against Director of Cooperative Bank. Cooperative Bank Falls Within Definition of Financial Establishment Under MPID Act Despite Being Governed by Banking Regulation Act.
6 May 2024The Bombay High Court dismissed a writ petition filed under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Pro...
- 622
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Appointment of Returning Officer in Co-operative Society Election Due to Non-Compliance with Statutory Panel Requirement. Appointment of Returning Officer Must Be from Panel Prepared by State Co-operative Election Authority Under Section 144Y of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 and Rule 74(2)(b) of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies (Election to Committee) Rules, 2014.
19 Jan 2024The petitioners, members of Respondent No.5 Co-operative Housing Society, challenged the appointment of Respondent No.4 as Returning Officer for the s...
- 40
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Co-operative Bank's Petition to Recover Training Costs from Employees Who Resigned After Training — Training Bond Enforceable Under Contract Law. The court held that training bonds are not unconscionable and the bank is entitled to recover actual training costs under Sections 73 and 74 of the Indian Contract Act, 1872, as the employees voluntarily executed the bonds and the bank incurred expenses.
12 Jul 2023The Bombay High Court, in a writ petition filed by The Satara District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. (the Bank), challenged the order of the Commissi...
- 35
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Against Cooperative Society's Resolution Reducing Retirement Age. Service Dispute Between Cooperative Society and Its Employees Is Not Covered Under Section 91 of Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act, 1960, Hence Writ Petition Maintainable.
27 Jun 2017The petitioners, five retired employees of Respondent No. 4 (Beed Zilla Parishad Doodh Utpadak Sangh Maryadit, a cooperative society registered under ...
- 46
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Second Appeal in Cooperative Society Mortgage Dispute — Section 164 Notice Not Required When Suit Filed Against Non-Member. Purchaser of property not a member of cooperative society is not required to serve notice under Section 164 of the Maharashtra Cooperative Societies Act before filing suit for injunction against the society.
12 Aug 2014The appellant, Gajanan Eknath Sonankar, purchased agricultural land Gat No. 83 admeasuring 2 Acres at Mouja Lasura Bk., Tq. Shegaon, Dist. Buldhana by...
- 154
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes Show Cause Notice in Co-operative Housing Society Dispute — Deputy Registrar Lacked Jurisdiction to Record Disqualification Under Section 73(1AB) Without Prior Inquiry. The court held that a finding of disqualification under Section 73(1AB) of the Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 cannot be recorded without affording an opportunity of hearing to the affected members.
10 Aug 2012The petitioner, Vithal Nagar Co-operative Housing Society Ltd., challenged an order-cum-show cause notice dated 9.11.2011 issued by the Deputy Registr...
- 77
High Court
High Court of Judicature at Bombay, Aurangabad Bench, Considers Multiple Writ Petitions Against Maharashtra State Co-operative Bank's Securitisation Action Over Sugar Factory Assets. The Core Legal Question is Whether a Co-operative Bank Qualifies as a 'Bank' Under the Securitisation and Reconstruction of Financial Assets and Enforcement of Security Interest Act, 2002, and the Validity of Measures Taken Under Section 13(4) Thereof.
19 Dec 2006The matter arose from multiple writ petitions filed before the Bombay High Court (Aurangabad Bench) concerning the assets of Shankar Sahakari Sakhar K...
High Court
Bombay High Court Considers Constitutional Challenge to Development Control Regulation 33(7) Allowing Enhanced FSI for Reconstruction. Petition Filed by Public-Spirited Citizens Claims Regulation Exacerbates Population Congestion in Island City.
11 Dec 2006This public interest litigation, filed by three public-spirited citizens of Mumbai, challenged the legality of Regulation 33(7) of the Development Con...
High Court
Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals by Cooperative Bank Against Appointment of Bank Inspector. Appointment Under Section 79 of Maharashtra Co-operative Societies Act, 1960 Is Administrative, Not Quasi-Judicial, and Writ Petition Not Maintainable Due to Alternative Remedy Under Section 152.
30 Nov -0001The case involves three Letters Patent Appeals filed by Pune District Central Co-operative Bank Ltd. against orders of a Single Judge dismissing its w...
- 127
