Search Results for "Evidence Closed"

3386 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 3386 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Widow's Claim for Medical Reimbursement Under Rajiv Gandhi Jeevandayee Arogya Yojana for Ayurvedic Treatment of Deceased Husband. Treatment at Government-Recognized Ayurvedic Hospital Held Covered Under Scheme Despite Initial Denial by Insurance Company.

The petitioner, Kiran Bhaskar Surgade, widow of Dr. B.S. Surgade, filed a writ petition seeking reimbursement of medical expenses incurred for the tre...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Rules on Unlawful Subletting: Transfer of Tenancy Disguised as Business Sale Invalid. Court highlights the misuse of tenancy rights and emphasizes protection of landlords under Bombay Rent Act.

The Bombay High Court ruled in favor of the petitioner, legal heirs, in a long-standing eviction dispute regarding unlawful subletting of commercial p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Quashes Lok Adalat Award Filed by Non-Guardian of Minor, Remands Claim Petition. Absence of Proper Representation of Minor Vitiated Compromise, and Compensation Was Not Determined as Per Law.

A minor child and her paternal grandmother (as next friend) approached the High Court under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution and Section 173(1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Cheque Dishonour Case — Service of Statutory Notice Valid Despite Unsigned Office Copy. Absence of Signature on Office Copy of Demand Notice Does Not Invalidate Service Under Section 138(b) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881.

The appellant, Vardhman Steel, filed a complaint under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 against the respondent, Sai Engineering, al...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Compulsory Retirement Order of IRS Officer Due to Bias and Malice. Compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of Fundamental Rules, 1922, set aside as it was punitive, violated natural justice due to biased committee members, and disregarded clean service record.

The dispute involved an Indian Revenue Service officer challenging his compulsory retirement under Rule 56(j) of the Fundamental Rules, ordered three ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal in Arbitration Delay Case — Section 14 of Limitation Act Applicable to Section 34 Applications. Supreme Court Precedent in Consolidated Engineering Enterprises v. Principal Secretary, Irrigation Department Held Binding, District Judge's Order Condoning Delay Restored.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by the Defence Estate Officer against the judgment of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court....