Search Results for "Bangalore Development Authority Act, 1976"

344 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 344 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Penal Back Billing Order in Electricity Theft Case — No Evidence of Tampering or Pilferage. Mere Fluctuation in Load Factor Does Not Attract Penal Provisions Under Clause 42.05 of Conditions of Supply of Electricity.

The petitioner, M/s Eureka Forbes Limited, a public limited company, owned a composite premises in Bommasandra Industrial Area, Bengaluru. In 2007, it...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Quashes CAT Interim Order in Service Matter — Deputation Absorption Dispute. CAT lacked jurisdiction to restrain State Government from absorbing deputationists into Karnataka Administrative Service, and order passed without hearing affected parties violates natural justice.

The petitioners, eight officers of the Karnataka State Government, were on deputation to various departments and were sought to be absorbed into the K...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Declares Land Acquisition Proceedings Lapsed for Non-Passage of Award Under BDA Act. Petitioner's Suit for Injunction Decreed in 2010, Acquisition Deemed Lapsed Due to Failure to Pass Award Within Reasonable Time.

The petitioner, M.P. Gundappa, owned 2 acres of land in Sy.No.124/2 at Nagadevanahalli, Kengeri Hobli, Bengaluru South Taluk. The land was notified fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under Karnataka Act for Twelve Months in First Instance. Detention Order Held Illegal as Contravening Proviso to Section 3(2) and Supreme Court Precedent in Cherukuri Mani; Detenu Ordered Released.

The petitioner, Yallappa, a poor coolie living with his wife and children in Raichur, was detained under the Karnataka Prevention of Dangerous Activit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Hears Appeals in Motor Accident Claims Challenging Tribunal's Absolution of Insurer and Inadequate Compensation. Claimants Argue That Insurer Failed to Prove Driving Licence Breach and Must Pay Under 'Pay and Recover' Principle of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

The appeals arose from a motor vehicle accident on 30.06.2009 where a husband and wife on a motorcycle were hit by a rashly driven Light Goods Vehicle...