GULFISHA FATIMA
1 Jan 1970The present appeals before the Supreme Court arise from a common judgment of the High Court of Delhi which affirmed the rejection of bail applications...
Search Results for "interest under Section 30(4)"
761 result(s) found
Found 761 result(s)
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Allows Applicant in Medical Treatment Withdrawal Case — CANH Held to Be Medical Treatment and Withdrawal Permitted Under Best Interest Principle. Right to Die with Dignity under Article 21 Recognised to Include Withholding of Life-Sustaining Treatment from Patient in Permanent Vegetative State.
1 Jan 1970The matter arose from a tragic accident in 2013 when Harish Rana, then a 20-year-old engineering student, fell from the fourth floor of his accommodat...
- 55
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Rights of Trafficking Victims, Issues Guidelines for Rescue and Rehabilitation. Court Holds That State Must Take Reasonable Measures to Safeguard Right to Rehabilitation Under Article 21.
1 Jan 1970This Miscellaneous Application arose from a prior disposed Public Interest Litigation regarding human trafficking. The petitioner sought enforcement o...
- 57
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Upholds Conviction of Bus Driver in Fatal Accident Case. Concurrent findings of fact by lower courts on rash and negligent driving causing death of four persons under Sections 279, 337, and 304-A IPC affirmed.
20 Feb 2019The appellant, Thangasamy, was convicted by the Trial Court for offences under Sections 279, 337 (3 counts), and 304-A (4 counts) of the Indian Penal ...
- 364
High Court
Bombay High Court Hears Confirmation Case and Appeal of Police Naik in Mass Killing Incident — Review of Death Sentence Under Section 302 IPC. Court Examines Whether Firing by SRPF Officer at Village Keshori Resulting in Five Deaths Constitutes Offence Punishable with Capital Punishment.
21 Aug 2006The matter concerned a confirmation case and criminal appeal arising from the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, Bhandara, which convicted and...
- 25
High Court
High Court Upholds Bail Order for Juvenile in Fatal Accident Case While Criticizing Enforcement Agencies for Public Pressure Influence. Bail Granted Under Section 12(1) of Juvenile Justice (Care and Protection of Children) Act, 2015 with Conditions Including Study of Traffic Rules and Counseling, Despite Allegations of Rash Driving Under Influence.
25 Jun 2024The judgment arose from a writ petition concerning a juvenile, referred to as Master X or CCL (child in conflict with law), involved in a fatal accide...
- 420
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Adjudicates Multiple Writ Appeals on Recruitment and Reservation in Primary and Secondary Education Department. Dispute Arises from Selection Process for Backward Classes Welfare Department Posts and Alleged Irregularities in Admissions/Centralised Admission Cell Procedures.
12 Oct 2023A Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka heard a batch of writ appeals filed by 43 appellants against the State of Karnataka, its education dep...
- 20
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Upholds Conviction Under Section 304 Part I IPC for Culpable Homicide Not Amounting to Murder, Dismisses State Appeal for Conviction Under Section 302 IPC. The court held that the act of the accused in causing a single blow on the head of the deceased with a stick, without premeditation or intention to cause death, falls under Exception 4 to Section 300 IPC, reducing the offence from murder to culpable homicide not amounting to murder.
12 Jan 2024The case involves two appeals: one by the accused Sureshgouda S. Satmar challenging his conviction under Sections 304 Part I and 201 of the Indian Pen...
- 117
High Court
Bombay High Court Upholds Expressway Land Acquisition Compensation Process; Dismisses Farmers’ Writ Petitions
17 Feb 2026The petitions were filed by farmers whose lands were acquired for the Jalna–Nanded Super Express Highway project. The landowners challenged the ...
- 274
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in POCSO Case Due to Denial of Cross-Examination Right. Conviction under Sections 448 and 376 IPC r/w Section 5(j)(ii) r/w Section 6 of POCSO Act set aside as accused was not given opportunity to cross-examine prosecution witnesses, violating principles of natural justice.
23 Dec 2020The appellant, Govindaraju @ Kutti, was convicted by the LIII Additional City Civil and Sessions Judge, Bangalore, in Special CC No.527/2016 for offen...
- 124
