Search Results for "deed interpretation"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "deed interpretation"

1564 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1564 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Civil Revision Petition in Suit for Declaration of Joint Family Property — Plaint Not Liable for Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC. Daughters and Minor Son's Suit for Declaration of Joint Family Property and Partition is Maintainable Despite Alleged Prior Partition Deed.

7 Mar 2025

The petitioner-defendant No. 3 filed a civil revision petition under Section 115 of CPC challenging the order dated 19.07.2023 passed by the Senior Ci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application for Rejection of Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance and Injunction — Held that Plaint Discloses Cause of Action and is Not Barred by Limitation. The court held that the plaint cannot be rejected under Order VII Rule 11 CPC as the suit is within limitation and discloses a cause of action.

16 Jul 2016

The case involves a Notice of Motion filed by Defendant No. 11, Lily Realty Private Limited, in a suit for specific performance and injunction. The pl...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958 — Petitioner Entitled to Refund Despite Delay in Application. The court held that the limitation period under Section 49 should be liberally construed to avoid unjust enrichment, and that the petitioner's delay in applying for refund was condonable as the transactions never materialized.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

W.A.No.3582 of 2024

6 Mar 2025

...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Refund of Stamp Duty for Unconsummated Transactions Under Section 49 of Maharashtra Stamp Act, 1958. Petitioner's applications for refund were within limitation period and refusal by authorities was arbitrary.

21 Sep 2023

The petitioner, Vilas Eknath Nandgude, filed six writ petitions challenging orders dated 31 December 2019 passed by the Deputy Inspector General of Re...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal Against Ad-Interim Injunction on Ground of Want of Pecuniary Jurisdiction — Suit Valuation Dispute Under Section 6 of the Bombay Court Fees Act, 1959

24 Mar 2021

The case involves an appeal filed by Zuberahmed Maqbool Ansari (original Defendant No.2) against an ad-interim order dated 24.09.2020 passed by a lear...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeals in Property Suit — Upholds Refusal to Strike Out Defence Under Order 8 Rule 10 CPC for Failure to File Written Statement Within 90 Days. The court held that the power to strike out defence is discretionary and not automatic, and that non-disclosure of defence under Order 6A Rule 3 CPC does not justify striking out.

21 Dec 2017

The present appeals arise from a suit filed in 1987 by Behram Nowrosji Gamadia and Jehangir Dhan Mistri (original plaintiffs) against several defendan...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Second Appeal in Partition Suit — Reopening of Partition Permitted Due to Non-Inclusion of Joint Family Property. The Court held that a prior partition decree not binding on the plaintiff as she was not a party and the property was joint family property.

9 Oct 2017

The appellant, Monakka Shinde, filed a suit (O.S. 370/2004) for reopening of partition, declaration, and injunction against her sons, Maruti Shinde an...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Arbitral Award in Joint Venture Dispute — State Not Liable for Delay in Obtaining Approvals. The court held that the State Government did not breach the Joint Venture Agreement by failing to obtain necessary approvals within a reasonable time, as the agreement did not impose an absolute obligation on the State.

11 May 2012

The appellant, Carol Info Services Limited, entered into a Joint Venture Agreement with the State of Maharashtra to establish a super specialty hospit...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Civil Procedure Case Upholding Rejection of Plaint Under Order 7 Rule 11 CPC. The Court Held That Res Judicata Cannot Be Determined in an Order 7 Rule 11 Application as It Requires Examination of Previous Suit Records Beyond Plaint Averments Under the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908.

9 Aug 2021

The appeal arose from a judgment of the High Court of Karnataka dismissing a revision petition against an order of the Trial Court that rejected an ap...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)