Search Results for "Section 140 Contract Act"

282 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 282 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitioner's Challenge to Rejection of Plaint and Amendment in Specific Performance Suit — Consent Decree Not Binding on Third Party. Plaint Disclosed Cause of Action and Limitation Was a Mixed Question of Fact and Law.

The petitioner, Bharat Mulji Khona, was the defendant in a suit for specific performance filed by M/s. Fiza Construction Company (respondent no.1) see...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Dismisses State Appeal Against Acquittal in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witnesses and Lack of Corroboration. Demand and Acceptance of Bribe Not Proved Beyond Reasonable Doubt Under Sections 7, 13(1)(d), 13(2) of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988.

The State of Gujarat filed an appeal under Section 378 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, challenging the judgment and order of acquittal dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Partly Allows Appeal by Corporation in Dismissed Bus Driver Case — Review Order Upheld but Back Wages Reduced to 50%. Corporation's Suppression of Evidence Before Labour Court Constitutes Perversity, but Full Back Wages Not Automatic Under Industrial Disputes Act, 1947.

The case involves an appeal by the Maharashtra State Road Transport Corporation against a High Court order that allowed a review petition filed by Mah...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Appeal by Owner in Motor Accident Claim — Insurance Company Liable Despite Invalid Driving Licence Due to Lack of Owner's Knowledge. Employer Not Required to Verify Licence Validity for Transport Vehicle When Driver Produced Licence.

The appeal arises from a judgment of the Motor Accident Claims Tribunal (MACT), Chandrapur, in Motor Accident Claims Petition No. 120/2006. The deceas...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Interprets 'Filed' in ITO Order as Termination of Proceedings Under Section 34 of Income-tax Act, 1922. The Order That a Case is 'Filed' Disposes of the Proceeding, Rendering Fresh Notice for Reassessment Valid.

The case arose from reassessment proceedings under the Income-tax Act, 1922. The Additional Income-tax Officer issued a notice under Section 34 and, a...