Search Results for "Procurement Procedure"

257 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 257 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows State to Enhance Royalty/Dead Rent in Mining Leases Despite Absence of Express Clause. Statutory Provisions Under Section 15(3) of MMDR Act and Rules 10 and 21 of Punjab Minor Mineral Concession Rules, 1964 Impliedly Authorize Enhancement During Subsistence of Lease.

The Supreme Court considered two civil appeals arising from Special Leave Petitions filed by the State of Haryana against judgments of the Punjab and ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Upholds Mandatory Solar Water Heater Condition for Electricity Connection in Gulbarga. Condition requiring installation of solar water heater for new electricity connections held valid under Section 86(1)(e) of the Electricity Act, 2003 and Regulation 4.02(vi) of KERC Regulations.

The petitioner, Md Hasnuddin, owner of a house in Gulbarga, applied for an electricity connection from the Gulbarga Electricity Supply Company (GESCOM...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Suit for Short Delivery in Multimodal Transport Due to Limitation Under Carriage of Goods by Sea Act, 1925. The court held that the suit filed beyond one year from delivery was time-barred and plaintiff failed to prove short delivery.

The plaintiff, M/s. Assobhai Bhanji and Sons, a registered partnership firm engaged in import and export of dairy and agro products, filed a suit agai...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Sets Aside Order Directing Filing of Charge Sheet Without Sanction in Prevention of Corruption Act Case. Sanction for Prosecution Under Section 19 of Prevention of Corruption Act, 1988 is Mandatory Before Cognizance Can Be Taken by Special Judge.

The case involves two criminal revision petitions arising from an order dated 15.03.2008 passed by the Principal Sessions Judge, Gulbarga, in Special ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Appeal in Central Excise Refund Case — Assessee Passed on Duty Incidence to Customers, Refund Claim Rejected. Section 12B of Central Excise Act, 1944 bars refund if duty burden shifted to others.

The appellant, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Ltd., is engaged in manufacturing passenger utility vehicles and parts thereof, which are excisable under C...