Search Results for "PW1"

2658 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 2658 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Lack of Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The appellants, Kashinath s/o Dnyanoba Ghodke and Parvati w/o Kashinath Ghodke, were convicted by the trial court for the murder of a person under Sec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Abetment of Suicide Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Instigation. Conviction under Sections 498-A and 306 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to prove cruelty or abetment beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to an appeal against the conviction of Ramdas Dhondu Kalatkar (appellant no.1) and Bharti Ramdas Kalatkar (appellant no.2, since dec...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Direct Evidence and Unreliable Circumstantial Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, M.Raja, was convicted by the Additional District and Sessions Judge (FTC), Vellore District, for the murder of Rajesh under Section 302...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Electrocution Death Case Due to Lack of Evidence of Knowledge and Common Intention. Conviction under Section 304 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove That Appellants Knew the Electric Wire Was Lethal.

The appellants, Vilas Hari Kulmethe and Laxman Kanhu Pendam, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur, for offences under Section 3...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Life Conviction for Murder Based on Motive and Circumstantial Evidence — Appellants Convicted Under Section 302 IPC for Killing Deceased Due to Sister's Suicide Over Love Affair.

The appellants, Anil Kallappa Parshetty and Manoj Kallappa Parshetty, were convicted by the 5th Additional Sessions Judge, Sangli, for the murder of R...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Considers Appeals Against Conviction Under Sections 302/149, 147, 148, 427 IPC — Trial Court Had Sentenced Appellants to Life Imprisonment. Appellants Challenged Conviction Based on Alleged Assault with Deadly Weapons Leading to Death.

This matter involved two criminal appeals and a bail application arising from the same judgment of the trial court. The appellants were original accus...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Nine Accused in Murder and Rioting Case. Appellants convicted under Sections 148, 302, 324 IPC for attacking complainant family with deadly weapons, resulting in one death and multiple injuries.

The case involves an appeal by nine accused persons against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Baramati, for offences under Sections 1...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Common Intention. Conviction under Section 302 read with 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish the common object and individual overt acts beyond reasonable doubt.

The case involves multiple criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction under Section 302 read with Section 34 of the Indian Pena...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Bombay at Aurangabad Considers Whether Evidence Proves Attempt to Rape or Outraging Modesty in Case Involving Mentally Retarded Victim

This criminal appeal challenged the judgment and order dated 27/01/2017 passed by the Additional Sessions Judge, Ahmednagar in Sessions Case No.219 of...