Search Results for "Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act"

471 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 471 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Student in SC/ST Act Case Due to Lack of Public View. Caste-Based Insult Allegation Fails as Incident Occurred in Private Setting, Not in Public View Under Section 3(1)(r) of SC & ST (Prevention of Atrocities) Act, 1989.

The petitioner, Harsh Anil Singh, a 19-year-old student, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India read with Section 482 of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Modifies Sentence in NDPS Case Due to Quantity Below Commercial Threshold. Appellant's Sentence Reduced from 10 to 6 Years for Possession of 6.300 kg Ganja Under Section 8(c) and 20(b) of NDPS Act.

The appellant, Issak Nabab Shah, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Kopargaon, for offences under Section 8(c) and 20(b) of the Narcotic ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Narcotics Control Bureau Against Acquittal in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appeal was filed by the Narcotics Control Bureau against the acquittal of the respondent for an offence under Section 21 read with Section 8(c) of...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against Acquittal in Gold Smuggling Case — Retracted Confession and Lack of Independent Witnesses Lead to Acquittal Confirmation. Section 108 Customs Act statement retracted on ground of coercion and not corroborated by independent evidence, hence not reliable.

The case involves an appeal by the Union of India against the acquittal of Narendra Ratanchand Jain (respondent no.1) for offences under the Customs A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Customs Appeal Against Acquittal in Gold Smuggling Case — Prosecution Fails to Prove Seizure Beyond Reasonable Doubt. Recovery of Foreign Marked Gold Bars from Accused Not Established Due to Lack of Independent Panch Witnesses and Contradictions in Evidence.

The case pertains to an appeal filed by the Union of India through the Assistant Collector of Customs against an order of acquittal dated 4-10-2001 pa...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Essential Commodities Act Case Due to Invalid Investigation by Assistant Commissioner of Police. Investigation by officer not of rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police violates Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, leading to quashing of FIR and proceedings.

The petitioners, Sarvesh Kumar Shahi and Samiresh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the initiation of proceedings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Challenge to SAFEMA Forfeiture Order — Agricultural Land Acquired Prior to Detention Exempt from Forfeiture. Property acquired before the 'illegal' period under Section 2(2)(b) of SAFEMA cannot be forfeited; appellate authority's order partly confirmed.

The petitioner, Ranchhodbhai Bhagwanbhai Tandel (since deceased, through his legal heir Naresh Ranchhodbhai Tandel), filed a criminal writ petition un...