Search Results for "NDPS Act, 1985"

396 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 396 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in PIT-NDPS Case for Lack of Material Linking to Public Order. Detention under Section 3 of PIT-NDPS Act, 1988 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not establish disturbance to public order.

The petitioner, Sanjaybhai @Center Dhirubhai Rathod, through his wife Pintuben Sanjaybhai Rathod, challenged the preventive detention order dated 06.0...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Orders Under Tamil Nadu Act 14 of 1982 Due to Unexplained Six-Month Delay. Detention Orders Passed Without Considering Possibility of Bail Under Section 37 of NDPS Act, 1985, Violating Doctrine of Live Proximity.

The case involved two habeas corpus petitions filed before the Madurai Bench of Madras High Court under Article 226 of the Constitution, challenging p...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition to Defreeze Bank Accounts in NDPS Act Case — Petitioner Company Not an Accused Under Section 68F. Freezing order under Section 68F of NDPS Act, 1985 cannot be sustained against a company that is not an accused in the predicate offence.

The petitioner, M/s. Ownpath Learning Private Limited, a registered startup under DPIIT, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Const...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, Gangaram s/o Jairam Chaudekar, was convicted under Section 20(b)(i) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 57 — Failure to Inform Immediate Superior Officer Renders Search and Seizure Illegal. The court held that strict compliance with Section 57 of the NDPS Act, 1985 is mandatory and non-compliance vitiates the conviction.

The appellant, Ruffus Leo Manuel, was convicted by the NDPS Court at Mapusa under Section 20(b)(ii) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Failure to Inform Accused of Right to be Searched Before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Renders Search Illegal and Conviction Unsustainable.

The appellant, a Nigerian national, was convicted by the Special Judge in NDPS Case No. 116 of 2000 for an offence under Section 8(c) punishable under...