Search Results for "Maharashtra Goods and Service Tax Act"

350 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 350 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging GST Assessment Order for Violation of Natural Justice. Failure to Provide Personal Hearing and Proper Opportunity to Respond to Show Cause Notice Renders Assessment Order Invalid Under Section 75(4) of MGST Act, 2017.

The petitioners, Cowtown Software Design Pvt. Ltd. and its Associate General Manager Milind Karnik, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Con...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Directs Customs to Consider Reward to Informer's Widow Under Circular 20/2015 — Withholding of Reward Unjustified. The court held that the reward policy must be applied and the widow's representation must be considered within eight weeks.

The petitioner, Jayashree Chandrakant Dhavre, is the widow of a deceased informer who provided specific information to the Marine and Preventive Wing ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Sub-Classification Within Scheduled Castes for Reservation in Punjab Act. State can provide preferential treatment to more backward castes without tinkering with Presidential List under Article 341.

The Supreme Court considered the constitutional validity of Section 4(5) of the Punjab Scheduled Caste and Backward Classes (Reservation in Services) ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeal in Cooperative Bank CEO Appointment Dispute — Upholds Apex Society's Power to Depute Cadre Officers. Section 54(3) of Chhattisgarh Co-Operative Societies Act, 1960 obligates District Central Cooperative Bank to accept CEO deputed by State Cooperative Bank from its cadre.

The dispute arose from the appointment of the Chief Executive Officer (CEO) of the first respondent, Zila Sahkari Kendriya Bank Maryadit, a District C...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Maharashtra Fire Prevention Act, 2006 as Constitutionally Valid. Levy of fire prevention fee under Section 12 is a fee, not a tax, and the Act is within legislative competence.

The petitioners, Vidarbha Taxpayers Association and a citizen, filed a Public Interest Litigation challenging the constitutional validity of the Mahar...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Section 27(3) of Consumer Protection Act, 1986 — Summary Trial for Non-Compliance Upheld. Section 27(3) is a complete code and does not violate Articles 14 and 21 of the Constitution.

The petitioner, Shri A. G. Sawant, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitution read with Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition of Agricultural Societies Challenging Licence Cancellation Under Maharashtra APMC Act. Societies Failed to Establish Market Yard Despite Show-Cause Notice and Opportunity of Hearing.

The petitioners, fourteen agricultural produce societies, filed a writ petition challenging the cancellation of their licences under the Maharashtra A...