Search Results for "Expeditious trial"

629 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 629 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Madras High Court Allows Revision, Restores Temporary Mandatory Injunction for Cart Track Access in Property Dispute. Appellate Court Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Order 43 Rule 1(r) CPC by Re-appreciating Evidence on Merits Instead of Confining to Jurisdictional Errors.

The petitioners (plaintiffs) filed a civil suit seeking a permanent injunction and a temporary mandatory injunction to restore a cart track that alleg...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Grants Bail to Accused Summoned Under Section 319 CrPC in Murder Case - Sets Higher Evidentiary Standard for Bail in Section 319 Proceedings

The Supreme Court heard two connected criminal appeals regarding bail matters in a murder case -- The first appeal was filed by MD Imran @ D.C. Guddu ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Application to Set Aside Consent Decree in Commercial Suit — No Fraud or Collusion Found. Consent Terms Recorded in Suit for Specific Performance of Share Purchase Agreement Were Valid and Binding, Not Vitiated by Fraud or Misrepresentation Under Order XXIII Rule 3 CPC.

The judgment arises from a Notice of Motion filed by the original defendants (applicants) in a commercial suit seeking to set aside a consent decree d...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Accused to File Affidavit in Lieu of Oral Evidence in NI Act Case — Section 145(2) of Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881 Permits Accused to Give Evidence on Affidavit, Reversing Trial Court's Rejection.

The petitioner, Afzal Pasha, was the accused in a complaint filed under Section 138 of the Negotiable Instruments Act, 1881, pending before the XIV Ad...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Revision Against Trial Court's Order Permitting Re-examination of Complainant's Witness in NI Act Case. Court holds that once a witness is discharged, recalling for further examination is impermissible without justifiable cause under Section 311 CrPC.

The applicant, Anil s/o Govindrao Chaudhari, challenged two orders passed by the Judicial Magistrate, First Class, Nagpur dated 14/9/2012 and 15/01/20...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Extension of Time to File Written Statement Beyond 90 Days in Civil Suit — Order VIII Rule 1 CPC Held Directory. Petitioner/Defendant Granted Relief as No Dilatory Tactics Were Adopted and Sufficient Cause Was Shown for Delay.

The petitioner/defendant challenged the judgment and order dated 30th June 2003 passed by the learned Civil Judge, Junior Division, Margao, which decl...