Search Results for "Domestic Violence Act"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Dismisses Appeal in Compulsory Retirement Case Based on Declining ...
Supreme Court Upholds High Court's Determination that Non-Signatory to MoS Not B...

Search Results for "Domestic Violence Act"

605 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 605 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Quashes FIR in Matrimonial Cruelty Case — Specific Allegations Against Husband and Mother-in-Law Upheld, General Allegations Against Brother-in-Law and His Wife Quashed. Court Held That General and Omnibus Allegations Cannot Force Relatives to Undergo Trial Under Section 482 CrPC.

31 Jul 2024

The petitioners, including the husband, mother-in-law, brother-in-law, and his wife, sought quashing of FIR No.132/2013 registered at Vita Police Stat...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Considers Petition to Quash Matrimonial Cruelty and Dowry Case. Husband Challenges Criminal Proceedings Alleging Vague Allegations and Abuse of Process.

28 Jun 2024

The petition was filed under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, seeking quashing of criminal proceedings pending in C.C.No.19072/202...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes Process Against In-Laws in Domestic Violence Case for Lack of Specific Allegations of Breach of Protection Order. Section 31 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 requires willful breach of a protection order; mere non-compliance with interim order without specific averments does not attract the offence.

10 Jun 2022

The petitioners, Harsherekha Ajay Garg (mother-in-law) and Anirudha Ajay Garg (husband), challenged an order dated 30 September 2021 passed by the lea...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Trial Court Order in Child Custody Dispute Under Section 482 CrPC — Lack of Jurisdiction in Criminal Court to Decide Custody. Criminal Court Cannot Entertain Application for Custody of Children Under Section 97 CrPC When Children Are Not in Illegal Detention and Are with Father.

20 May 2021

The petitioner, Mr. Oliver Menezes, filed a petition under Section 482 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973 (CrPC) before the High Court of Karnata...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Tenant's Appeal in Maharashtra Tenancy Act Case — Right to Purchase Not Lost Due to Lack of Knowledge of Landlord's Death. The court held that the limitation period under Section 32-F of the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948 runs from the date the tenant gains knowledge of the cessation of the landlord's disability, not from the date of cessation itself.

18 Sep 2019

The case involves a dispute under the Maharashtra Tenancy and Agricultural Lands Act, 1948, concerning the right of tenants to purchase agricultural l...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeals in Section 498A Jurisdiction Case — Courts at Wife's Parental Home Have Jurisdiction Even Without Overt Acts of Cruelty There. Continuing Offence and Consequence-Based Jurisdiction Under CrPC Sections 178 and 179 Apply to Section 498A IPC.

9 Apr 2019

The case involves a group of appeals before the Supreme Court of India concerning the jurisdictional issue under Section 498A of the Indian Penal Code...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Forfeiture of Gratuity for Misappropriation by Bank Employee — Wilful Misconduct Under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972 Justifies Forfeiture of Entire Gratuity. The court held that misappropriation of funds by a bank employee constitutes wilful misconduct involving moral turpitude, and the employer is entitled to forfeit the entire gratuity under Section 4(6)(b)(ii) of the Payment of Gratuity Act, 1972.

14 Jun 2018

The petitioner, an ex-employee of the respondent bank, was terminated on 6 July 1996 after a departmental enquiry found him guilty of misappropriating...

High Court

Bombay High Court (Nagpur Bench) Quashes Order of Principal District Judge, Nagpur in Domestic Violence Appeal and Restores Magistrate’s Dismissal of Petition Under Section 12 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 — Admissions of Wife in Other Proceedings Prove Residence at Saunsar, Not Nagpur, Thus No Temporary Residence to Confer Jurisdiction. Pursuing Court Cases Does Not Constitute Temporary Residence; Temporary Residence Must Be in Ordinary Course and Not Set Up to Confer Jurisdiction Under Section 27 of the Act.

6 Apr 2018

The dispute arose from a petition under Section 12 of the Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005 filed by the respondent (wife) before t...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Petition Against Family Court Order Directing Payment of Rent for Wife's Alternate Accommodation in Divorce Proceedings. Family Court's Order Set Aside for Failure to Consider Financial Needs and Resources of Parties Under Section 19 of Protection of Women from Domestic Violence Act, 2005.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Amit Satish Shah, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11 March 2013 passed by the Family Court at Pune. The Family Court ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Husband's Petition Challenging Family Court's Interim Residence Order in Domestic Violence Case. Residence Order Under Section 19 of DV Act Cannot Be Passed as Interim Relief Before Disposal of Main Application Under Section 12.

14 Oct 2014

The petitioner, Mr. Amit Satish Shah, filed a writ petition challenging an order dated 11 March 2013 passed by the Family Court. The Family Court had ...

24 25 26 27 28

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)