NOTICE OF MOTION COMMERCIAL DIVISION NO. 196 OF 2018
27 Feb 2019...
Search Results for "workmen representation"
346 result(s) found
Found 346 result(s)
High Court
Bombay High Court Quashes IDBI Bank's Wilful Defaulter Declaration Against Non-Executive Director. The Court Holds that Failure to Provide Copies of Documents and Fair Hearing Violates Principles of Natural Justice and RBI Guidelines.
16 Oct 2019Background: The writ petition was filed by a non-executive director of Ruchi Soya Industries Limited, a public listed company, challenging his declara...
- 22
High Court
High Court of Karnataka hears multiple writ petitions seeking to quash land acquisition notifications for Nadaprabhu Kempegowda Layout. Petitioners challenged the preliminary notification dated 21.5.2008 and final notification dated 18.2.2010 issued under the Land Acquisition Act and the Bangalore Development Authority Act.
11 Jul 2014The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of writ petitions filed by numerous landowners. The petitioners sought to quash the preliminary...
- 42
High Court
High Court of Bombay, Nagpur Bench, Delivers Judgment on Appeals Concerning Locus Standi of Third-Party Residents in Excise Licence Cases. Court Examines Maintainability of Writ Petition When Alternate Remedy Exists Under Bombay Prohibition (Closure of Licence) Order, 2003.
13 Aug 2012The appeals arose from a common judgment of a Single Judge of the High Court in a writ petition filed by three local residents challenging the State G...
- 11
High Court
High Court of Karnataka Quashes Penalty of Censure Imposed on Police Inspector in Disciplinary Proceedings — Failure to Provide Documents and Denial of Reasonable Opportunity Violates Principles of Natural Justice. The court held that non-furnishing of documents requested by the delinquent officer amounts to violation of natural justice, and set aside the penalty of censure under the Karnataka Civil Services (Classification, Control and Appeal) Rules, 1978.
3 Sep 2018The petitioner, Shri Shrishail Shivappa Koujalagi, a Circle Police Inspector in the Railways, Hubballi, challenged the orders imposing a penalty of ce...
- 24
Supreme Court
Supreme Court Dismisses Corporate Debtor's Appeal Against Admission of Insolvency Application Under Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016. Erstwhile Directors Cannot Maintain Appeal After Appointment of Insolvency Professional, Signaling Paradigm Shift to Inability of Management to Continue if Unable to Pay Debts.
1 Aug 2026Background: The case arose under the newly enacted Insolvency and Bankruptcy Code, 2016 (IBC), which came into force in November-December 2016. The ap...
- 68
Supreme Court
CIVIL APPEAL NO. 7370 OF 2026
1 Jan 1970The present Civil Appeal arises from a suit for declaration of ownership of agricultural properties based on a Will dated 20.04.2018, allegedly execut...
- 41
High Court
Bombay High Court Allows Winding Up Petition Against Company for Failure to Repay Convertible Bonds — Debt Admitted and Company Unable to Pay Under Section 433(e) of Companies Act, 1956. The court held that where a debt is admitted and the company is commercially insolvent, a winding up order is justified.
30 Jul 2013The Bank of New York Mellon, London Branch, as trustee for bondholders, filed a winding up petition under Section 433(e) of the Companies Act, 1956 ag...
- 147
High Court
High Court of Madras Disposes of Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging Income Tax and GST Assessment Orders, Suo Motu Impleads State Bank of India. No specific legal finding or ratio is discernible from the available text.
24 Feb 2026The High Court of Madras heard a batch of writ petitions filed by multiple corporate entities, including Aqua Terra Coke and Energy Limited (formerly ...
- 37
High Court
High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru, in a PIL filed by a trade union of airport employees, pronounced an order on 14-09-2021, examining the legality of the privatisation of Mangaluru International Airport under the Airports Authority of India Act, 1994. The court considered allegations that the concession agreement with Adani Enterprises Limited violated Sections 12, 12A, and 21 of the Act, and that the bidding process lacked transparency.
14 Sep 2021The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a public interest litigation (PIL) filed by the Airports Authority Employees Union, a registered trade ...
- 27
