Search Results for "search and seizure before FIR"

590 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 590 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Absence of Public Witness. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Fails to Establish Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Prasada Sudhakar Kulkarni, was convicted under Section 302 of the Indian Penal Code, 1860 (IPC) for the murder of the victim. The prose...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Conviction of Parents for Murder of Daughter in Love Affair Dispute. Circumstantial Evidence Including Last Seen and Recovery Sufficient to Prove Homicide Under Sections 302 and 201 IPC.

The appellants, Mohammad Munna Sardar Khan and Shehnaz Banu Mohd. Khan, were convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Greater Bombay, for the murde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Delivers Judgment in Death Confirmation Reference and Criminal Appeal. Accused challenged conviction under Section 302 of Indian Penal Code for murder by acid attack, which resulted in victim's death.

The case arises out of a death confirmation reference and criminal appeal filed by the accused against the judgment of the Additional Sessions Judge, ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Judicature at Bombay Reviews Death Sentence Reference in Gang Rape and Murder Case. Conviction Based on Circumstantial Evidence of Last Seen Together and Forcible Abduction from House of Victim's Uncle.

The matter arises from a reference made by the Additional Sessions Judge, Nagpur, under Section 366 of the Code of Criminal Procedure, 1973, for confi...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

CRIMINAL APPEAL NO. 661 OF 2005

The case arose from Special Case No. 10 of 2001 before the III Additional Sessions Judge, Raigad, where eight accused faced trial on charges of kidnap...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Eyewitness and Inconsistent Medical Evidence. Conviction under Section 302 r/w 34 IPC set aside as sole eyewitness testimony found doubtful and medical evidence contradicted prosecution timeline.

The case pertains to the murder of Dashrath Charmya Kale, allegedly committed by the appellants, Bhurya @ Gulab s/o Fajitya Kale and his wife Suman, o...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Failure to Prove Motive. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Circumstantial Evidence Lacks Completeness and Chain of Events.

The judgment arises from two criminal appeals filed by the appellants against their conviction by the Additional Sessions Judge, Yavatmal in Sessions ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Upholds Conviction of Two Accused for Murder with Swords, Acquits Third Accused of All Charges. Common intention under Section 34 IPC established for fatal attack following trivial altercation.

The judgment arises from two connected appeals: Criminal Appeal No. 1515 of 2013 filed by original accused Nos. 1 and 2 (Parmar Chhaganbhai Bhojabhai ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in Murder Case Due to Unreliable Evidence and Procedural Lapses. Conviction under Sections 302, 326 read with Section 34 IPC set aside as prosecution failed to establish guilt beyond reasonable doubt.

The case pertains to the murder of Yeshwant Mohite on 22nd December 2011. The appellants, Rahul Shinde and Ashok Shinde, were convicted under Sections...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Acquits Accused in Murder Case Due to Lack of Credible Evidence and Unreliable Witnesses. Conviction under Section 302 IPC Set Aside as Prosecution Failed to Prove Guilt Beyond Reasonable Doubt.

The appellant, Soma @ Somanna, was convicted by the V Additional District and Sessions Judge, Devanahalli, Bangalore Rural District, in S.C. No. 136/2...