Search Results for "quash and remand"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals Against Madras High Court’s Setting Aside of Alien...
Supreme Court Hears Appeals on Permanent Establishment of Formula One World Cham...

Search Results for "quash and remand"

471 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 471 result(s)

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Order Refusing to Set Aside Ex-Parte Decree in Suit for Specific Performance. Court holds that the Trial Court's order refusing to set aside ex-parte decree under Order IX Rule 13 CPC was not perverse or capricious, and the petitioner failed to show sufficient cause for non-appearance.

13 Sep 2024

The petitioner, Sri. Raoji S/o. Devaji Patel, filed a writ petition under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging the order date...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Insurance Ombudsman Award for Violation of Natural Justice — Employer Not Heard Before Award. Group Personal Accident Policy Claim Decided Without Notice to Employer, Award Set Aside and Remitted for Fresh Hearing.

4 Jul 2024

The petitioner, M/s. Toyota Kirloskar Motor Pvt. Ltd., is a company engaged in the manufacture of motor vehicles. It had contracted a 'Group Personal ...

High Court

High Court Quashes Land Acquisition Compensation Denial Endorsements for Lack of Hearing and Proper Notice Under National Highways Act, 1956. The Court held that denial of compensation without notice under Section 3G(7) of the National Highways Act, 1956 and without opportunity of hearing is arbitrary and violative of natural justice.

6 Jan 2023

The petitioner, T. Younis @ Unees, a landowner, challenged two endorsements dated 20.05.2022 and 20.09.2022 issued by the Special Land Acquisition Off...

High Court

Bombay High Court Upholds Tribunal's Reinstatement Order in Service Dispute - Penalty of Dismissal Set Aside as Disproportionate to Misconduct of Signing Nomination Form. The court held that the punishment of dismissal was shockingly disproportionate to the misconduct of signing a nomination form as Principal, and reinstatement with back wages was justified.

23 Nov 2022

The petitioners, a trust and its college principal, challenged an order of the University and College Tribunal which set aside the dismissal of respon...

High Court

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR Against Petitioners in Food Adulteration Case — No Offence Made Out Under Food Safety and Standards Act, 2006. Sale of 'Mint' and 'Saunf' Products Not Prohibited Under Section 26(2)(i) of FSS Act, 2006 as They Are Not 'Food' as Defined.

13 Sep 2019

The petitioners, Anand Ramdhani Chaurasia and Vijay Banarasi Chaurasia, were engaged in the business of selling 'Mint' and 'Saunf' products. On 12th J...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Appeal Against SAFEMA Forfeiture Based on Invalid Detention Order — Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Quashed as Representation Not Considered Before Revocation, Forfeiture Set Aside

8 Apr 2019

The case involves a challenge to the forfeiture of properties under the Smugglers and Foreign Exchange Manipulators (Forfeiture of Property) Act, 1976...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Compulsory Retirement Order Due to Delay and Laches. Petitioner's challenge to a 1986 compulsory retirement order dismissed as the dispute was settled by compromise and the writ petition filed in 2014 was grossly delayed.

24 Mar 2014

The petitioner, S. Rudrappa, a retired cashier of The Mysore Merchants Co-op. Society Ltd., was compulsorily retired on 16.09.1986. He challenged the ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Ex-Parte Arbitral Award in Loan Recovery Dispute. Court holds that non-participation in arbitration despite notice and failure to prove fraud or bias does not warrant setting aside award under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

17 Jun 2013

The petitioners, The Loot (India) Pvt. Ltd. and its directors, were borrowers and guarantors who had taken a loan from Reliance Capital Limited (the f...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

29 Jul 2011

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Quashing of FIRs in NDPS Act Case Due to Lack of Evidence Against Applicants. No Contraband Recovered from Applicants, No Prima Facie Case Made Out Under Sections 2, 22, 27 of NDPS Act.

11 Aug 2010

The applicants filed a criminal application under Section 482 of the Criminal Procedure Code, 1973, seeking quashing of FIR No.56/2006 registered with...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)