Search Results for "procedural safeguards"

448 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 448 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Allows Writ Petition of Mutt Against Police Coercion — Police Directed Not to Interfere Without Judicial Order. Police Action of Coercing Religious Institution to Hand Over Brundavana Keys Held Illegal Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Uttaradi Mutt represented by its Peethadhipathi Sri Satyatma Teertha Swamiji, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitut...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dharwad Bench Allows Writ Petition of Mutt Against Police Coercion — Police Directed Not to Interfere Without Judicial Order. Police Action of Coercing Mutt to Hand Over Brundavana Keys Held Illegal Under Article 226 of the Constitution of India.

The petitioner, Uttaradi Mutt, represented by its Peethadhipathi Sri Satyatma Teertha Swamiji through its Chief Administrative Officer and GPA Holder ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes FIR in Essential Commodities Act Case Due to Invalid Investigation by Assistant Commissioner of Police. Investigation by officer not of rank of Deputy Superintendent of Police violates Section 6A of Essential Commodities Act, 1955, leading to quashing of FIR and proceedings.

The petitioners, Sarvesh Kumar Shahi and Samiresh Kumar, filed a writ petition before the Bombay High Court challenging the initiation of proceedings ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Validity of 50% Reservation for Women in Gram Panchayats — Rule 3(1)(c) of Maharashtra Village Panchayats (Reservation of Seats for Women) Rules, 1995 Held Intra Vires the Bombay Village Panchayats Act, 1958 and Article 243D of the Constitution.

The case involves a Letters Patent Appeal filed by Shri Tatyasaheb Ramchandra Kale against the judgment of a Single Judge of the Bombay High Court dis...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50. Conviction under Section 21 of NDPS Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper authorization and without informing accused of right to be searched before gazetted officer or magistrate.

The appellant, Suleman Oguk @ Soni, was convicted under Section 21 of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Act, 1985 (NDPS Act) by the Speci...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court at Goa Acquits Accused in NDPS Case for Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Search and Seizure of Charas from Hotel Room Vitiated as Mandatory Procedural Safeguards Not Followed.

The appellant, Dhansur Ghartimagar, was convicted by the Special Judge under Section 20(b)(ii)(C) of the Narcotic Drugs and Psychotropic Substances Ac...