Search Results for "power exchange"

1868 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 1868 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Due to Non-Application of Mind and Unexplained Delay. Detenu's Exoneration in Adjudication Proceedings Not Considered by Detaining Authority, Rendering Order Invalid Under Section 3(1) of COFEPOSA Act, 1974.

The petitioner, brother of the detenu Bherchand Tikaji Bora, challenged an order of detention dated 27th August 1998 passed under Section 3(1) of the ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petition Challenging Forfeiture of Properties under SAFEMA. Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Validly Triggers SAFEMA Proceedings Despite Non-Execution of Detention and Redemption of Confiscated Currency.

The petitioner, Smt. Yamini S. Bhagwanji, challenged the forfeiture of three immovable properties and certain bank accounts under the Smugglers and Fo...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes COFEPOSA Detention Order at Pre-Execution Stage Due to Non-Application of Mind and Mechanical Exercise of Power. Detaining Authority Failed to Consider Relevant Material and Grounds of Detention Were Vague and Stale.

The petitioner, Karnaram Lumbaji Choudhary, challenged a detention order dated 8th March 2018 passed by the Joint Secretary, Government of India, unde...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses PIL Challenging Land Allotment to Private Company in Title Dispute. Court holds that disputed questions of title cannot be adjudicated in PIL jurisdiction and that the petitioners failed to establish that the land was government property.

The case is a Public Interest Litigation (PIL) filed by two petitioners, Mr. Chetan Kamble and Mr. Vilas V. Devrukhkar, against the State of Maharasht...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Karnataka High Court Quashes Detention Order Under COFEPOSA Act Due to Non-Communication of Grounds of Detention. Detenu's Right to Make Effective Representation Under Article 22(5) of Constitution Violated as Grounds Not Served Within Statutory Period.

The petitioner, Smt. Bidisha Goin, wife of the detenu Pandian Muruganathan @ Shiva Pandian, filed a writ petition under Article 226 of the Constitutio...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Revision and Quashes Proceedings in Securities Contracts (Regulation) Act Case Due to Invalid Cognizance. Cognizance on Police Report Barred Under Section 26 of SCRA, 1956 — Proceedings in Sessions Case No.20/2019 Quashed.

The applicants, original accused in FIR No.II-34/2018 registered at Keshod Police Station, were charged with offences under Sections 4 and 5 of the Ga...