Search Results for "owner's ignorance"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "owner's ignorance"

343 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 343 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Petition to Set Aside Arbitral Award Under Section 34 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Award Found to Be in Conflict with Public Policy Due to Patent Illegality. The court held that the arbitral tribunal's interpretation of the contract was perverse and contrary to the terms of the agreement, warranting interference under Section 34.

25 Nov 2025

The present petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 was filed by Kotak Securities Limited (the petitioner) challenging...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal for Enhancement of Compensation in Motor Accident Claim - Negligence and Income Assessment Upheld. Widow's Claim for Higher Compensation Rejected as Tribunal's Award of Rs.5,62,000 for Death of Agriculturist Held Just and Proper Under Section 166 of Motor Vehicles Act, 1988.

15 Oct 2019

The appellant, Laxmibai, widow of Rama Tokalwad, filed an appeal under Section 166 of the Motor Vehicles Act, 1988, seeking enhancement of compensatio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Directs Municipal Corporation to Consider Regularization Applications Before Demolition in Mall Mezzanine Case. Occupants of Mall Entitled to Submit Regularization Application Under Section 53(3) of MRTP Act Due to Delayed Action by Corporation.

23 Sep 2014

The petitioners, occupants of a mall called 'Dreams the Mall' in Bhandup-West, challenged a notice issued under Section 53(1) of the Maharashtra Regio...

High Court

Bombay High Court Acquits Appellants in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Sections 42 and 50 of NDPS Act, 1985. Conviction under Sections 15, 22, 25 of NDPS Act and Section 18(C) of Drugs and Cosmetics Act set aside as search and seizure conducted without proper authorization and without informing accused of right to be searched before Gazetted Officer or Magistrate.

8 Oct 2013

The appeal arises from the judgment and order of the Special Court (NDPS) in Special Case No. 3/2011, whereby the appellants, Satpalsingh @ Raja s/o J...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Rejection of Plaint in Property Dispute — Suit Barred by Limitation Under Order 7 Rule 11(d) CPC. Clause 10 of Agreement for Sale Dated 31-03-1957 Was a Right of Re-Conveyance, Not a Contract for Sale, and Cause of Action Arose in 1988.

2 Sep 2013

The appellant, Kishorbhai Premchand Shah, filed a civil suit in the City Civil Court, Mumbai, seeking a declaration of ownership and permanent injunct...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Amendment to Plaint in Suit for Specific Performance — Period of Bona Fide Prosecution of Earlier Proceedings Excluded for Limitation Under Section 14 of Limitation Act, 1963. The court permitted the plaintiff to amend the plaint to seek exclusion of time spent in prosecuting a suit and appeal in the Small Causes Court, holding that such amendment is necessary for determining the real controversy and does not change the nature of the suit.

10 May 2013

The plaintiff, Bharat Petroleum Corporation Ltd. (BPCL), filed a suit for specific performance against the defendants in the Bombay High Court. The su...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Landlord's Eviction Petition in Rent Control Case — Tenant's Use of Residential Premises for Creche Constitutes Change of User and Nuisance. Running a creche in a residential tenancy amounts to change of user and nuisance, justifying eviction under the Bombay Rents, Hotel and Lodging House Rates Control Act, 1947.

10 May 2013

The original plaintiff, Smt. Sudha Sumant Barve (since deceased, represented by legal heirs), owned the ground and first floor of Shrikrupa Building i...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal in Property Dispute Against Municipal Corporation — Suit Barred by Limitation and Res Judicata. Claim for Declaration of Ownership and Injunction Fails as Plaintiff Failed to Prove Title and Suit Was Filed Beyond Limitation Period Under Limitation Act, 1963.

1 Apr 2005

The appeal arises from a suit filed in 1979 by the original plaintiff, Motilal Mahadev Sharma, against the Municipal Corporation of Greater Bombay see...

High Court

Bombay High Court at Goa Upholds Plaintiff's Prescriptive Title in Property Dispute — Continuous Possession for Over 30 Years Establishes Ownership Under Limitation Act, 1963. Adverse Possession Claim Succeeds as Defendants Fail to Prove Their Ownership or Possession of Survey No.85/1.

31 Mar 2005

The dispute concerns a property admeasuring about 6225 sq. metres, surveyed under No.85/1 as 'Shristhal' in Poinguinim village, Canacona Taluka, Goa. ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal by Complainant in NDPS Case Due to Non-Compliance with Section 42. Search Conducted Without Recording Information and Without Gazetted Officer or Magistrate Held Illegal, Acquittal Upheld.

17 Jan 2005

The appeal was filed by the original complainant, an Assistant Collector of Central Excise and Customs, Pune, challenging the judgment and order dated...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)