Search Results for "notice under Section 25(3)"

365 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 365 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Gram Panchayat's Property Tax Levy on Industrial Units in KIADB Area — Property Tax Under Karnataka Panchayat Raj Act, 1993 Is Valid Despite KIADB Land Ownership.

The judgment involves a batch of writ petitions filed by various industrial units located in the Sompura Industrial Area, developed by the Karnataka I...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Adverse Remarks and Costs Against Tax Officer in UP VAT Act Case Due to Violation of Natural Justice. High Court's Findings on Ex Parte Assessment and Service of Notice Upheld, but Ancillary Strictures and Penalties Set Aside for Lack of Hearing Opportunity.

The Supreme Court addressed appeals by a tax officer challenging adverse observations, remarks, and costs imposed by the High Court of Judicature at A...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Revenue's Petition Challenging Tribunal's Recall Order in Hawala Income Tax Case. Tribunal's power to recall its ex parte order under Section 254(2) of the Income Tax Act, 1961 is upheld as procedural rectification.

The case involves a writ petition filed by the Commissioner of Income Tax-12, Mumbai (Revenue) under Article 226 of the Constitution of India, challen...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Appeals Against High Court Order Quashing Selection Process for Technical Assistant Posts. Revision of Category-Wise Vacancies After Written Examination Does Not Change Rules of the Game When Done to Fulfill Reservation Mandates.

The Supreme Court heard appeals against a High Court judgment that quashed the selection process for 6628 posts of Technical Assistant (Group-C) in th...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Upholds Conviction in Food Adulteration Case Despite Procedural Lapses. Substantial Compliance of Section 13(2) of Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 Sufficient When No Prejudice Caused.

The appellant Vijendra was convicted under Section 7(1)/16(1)(a)(i) of the Prevention of Food Adulteration Act, 1954 for selling adulterated buffalo m...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Upholds Injunction Against Bird Feeding from Balcony in Nuisance Dispute. Feeding birds from a metal tray attached to balcony window causing accumulation of bird droppings and feathers held to constitute nuisance, and injunction granted under Section 38 of Specific Relief Act, 1963.

The case involves an appeal against an order granting a temporary injunction restraining the appellants (original defendant nos. 1 and 2) from feeding...