Search Results for "liberal approach"

792 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 792 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Allows Restoration of Suit Dismissed for Default, Condoning Delay of Over 4 Years Due to Sufficient Cause. The Court held that the Trial Court's rejection of condonation was perverse and that a liberal approach is warranted under Order IX Rule 9 CPC and Section 5 of Limitation Act.

The petitioner, heir of the original plaintiff, filed a Special Civil Application under Articles 226 and 227 of the Constitution of India challenging ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition in Property Dispute Due to Abatement. Failure to Bring Legal Representatives on Record Leads to Abatement Under Order 22 CPC.

The case pertains to a writ petition filed in the High Court of Bombay at Goa concerning a property dispute among family members. The petitioners, inc...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses PIL Challenging APMC Market Fee Exemption for Farmers. Exemption notification under Section 63 of Karnataka APMC Act, 1966 held valid and not violative of Article 14.

The petitioners, who are traders and commission agents in the Agricultural Produce Market Committee (APMC) yard at Tiptur, filed a Public Interest Lit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses State's Delay Condonation Application in Land Acquisition Appeal Due to Lack of Sufficient Cause. Delay of 1590 days in filing appeal against enhanced compensation not condoned as state failed to explain each day's delay under Section 5 of Limitation Act, 1963.

The case involves Civil Applications filed by the State of Maharashtra and its officers (applicants) seeking condonation of a 1590-day delay in instit...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Dismisses Writ Petitions Challenging Rejection of Condonation of Delay in Land Dispute Appeal. Delay of 1,000 Days in Filing Appeal Under Section 96 CPC Not Sufficiently Explained, No Interference Under Article 227.

The petitioners, who were the defendants in O.S. No. 48/2006 on the file of the Civil Judge (Jr.Dn.) at Periyapatna, filed an appeal under Section 96 ...