Search Results for "estoppel against statute"

520 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 520 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging Land Reservation for Sports Complex in Development Plan. Court upholds reservation of land for a multipurpose sports complex under the Maharashtra Regional and Town Planning Act, 1966, rejecting claims of non-implementation and lack of public purpose.

The Bharatiya Adhyatmic Society, a public charitable trust, owned land in Chembur, Mumbai. The land was reserved for a 'Chembur Multipurpose Complex' ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Considers Batch of Writ Petitions Challenging KERC Order Dated 14.05.2018. The Petitioners, Renewable Energy Companies, Seek to Quash the Regulatory Order.

The High Court of Karnataka at Bengaluru heard a batch of writ petitions filed by various renewable energy companies, including Renew Power Limited an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Dismisses Employee's Appeal in Resignation Withdrawal Case Under Maharashtra Universities Act, 1994. Withdrawal of Prospective Resignation Barred by Implied Contract and Estoppel as Correspondence Showed Mutual Agreement Making Resignation Final and Binding.

The appeal arose from a dispute over the withdrawal of a prospective resignation submitted by an employee before its effective date. The appellant, an...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Holds Body Building Eligible for 5% Sports Quota Reservation; Quashes Restrictive Government Resolution (2026)

The petitioner, a university-level Body Building Sportperson, challenged the Government Resolution dated 01/07/2016 which restricted the benefit of 5%...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Allows Regular First Appeals in Property Suit — Decree of Trial Court Set Aside for Non-Joinder of Necessary Parties. Suit for Partition and Separate Possession Held Not Maintainable Without Impleading All Co-Sharers Under Order 1 Rule 9 of CPC, 1908.

The judgment pertains to two Regular First Appeals filed under Section 96 of the Code of Civil Procedure, 1908, against the judgment and decree dated ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court of Karnataka Pronounces Judgment in Writ Appeal Concerning Bangalore Development Authority Road Access Dispute. Appeal Challenges Single Judge's Dismissal of Writ Petition Seeking Implementation of BDA Resolution After Lokayuktha and Supreme Court Directions.

This writ appeal was filed before the Division Bench of the High Court of Karnataka under Section 4 of the Karnataka High Court Act, 1961, challenging...