Search Results for "dangerous activities"

759 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 759 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere criminal antecedents insufficient to justify preventive detention.

The petitioner, Amit alias Montu Malyo S/o. Anadibhai Behera, through his mother Rashmita Anadibhai Behera, challenged the legality and validity of a ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 Due to Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention Order Set Aside as Mechanical and Without Application of Mind.

The petitioner, Manoj S/o Kantibhai Marvadi, was preventively detained by the Police Commissioner, Surat, under the Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Lack of Material Showing Disturbance to Public Order. Detention under Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as mere registration of FIRs does not justify preventive detention without evidence of public order impact.

The petitioner, Krish @ Kano S/O Jitendrabhai Bhuva (Patel), was preventively detained by an order dated 20.01.2026 passed by the Commissioner of Poli...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Gujarat High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order for Dangerous Person Due to Lack of Material on Public Order Disturbance. Detention under Section 2(c) of Gujarat Prevention of Anti-social Activities Act, 1985 set aside as order passed mechanically without application of mind.

The petitioner, Vicky Bhanubhai Varvadiya (Devipujak), through his brother Rahul Bhanubhai Varvadiya (Devipujak), challenged the preventive detention ...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order Under MPDA Act for Failure to Consider Less Restrictive Alternatives. Detenu's Right to Liberty Upheld as Detaining Authority Did Not Apply Mind to Necessity of Detention Over Criminal Prosecution.

The petitioner, Omkar Rajendra Bhosle, challenged a preventive detention order dated 3rd March 2025 issued by the Commissioner of Police, Pune City, u...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Quashing Detention Order Under M.P.D.A. Act Due to Non-Verification of In-Camera Statements. Subjective Satisfaction of Detaining Authority Vitiated as Statements Not Independently Verified.

The petitioner, Sourabh Kalu Koli, challenged an order of detention dated 7th March 2025 passed by the District Magistrate, Kolhapur (Respondent No.2)...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Quashes Preventive Detention Order in Telangana Act Case Due to Non-Application of Mind and Stale Material. Detenu Granted Bail Months Before Detention Order, Conditions Fulfilled, No Breach of Public Order Established.

The Supreme Court allowed the appeal against the preventive detention of the detenu under the Telangana Prevention of Dangerous Activities Act, 1986. ...