Search Results for "credited"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Supreme Court Upholds Refusal to Eschew Proof Affidavit in Probate Proceedings. ...
Supreme Court Allows Agriculturists' Appeal for Enhanced Compensation; Condones ...

Search Results for "credited"

969 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 969 result(s)

High Court

Bombay High Court Partially Allows Appeal of Convicted Accused and Dismisses State Appeal in Murder Case — Conviction under Section 302 IPC Upheld for One Accused, Acquittal under Section 307 IPC Confirmed. The court held that the conviction of appellant No.2 under Section 302 IPC was sustainable based on his specific overt act of inflicting a fatal injury, but the conviction of appellant No.3 under Section 302 IPC was not sustainable as his act of causing simple injury did not attract murder liability.

11 Oct 2023

The judgment arises from two connected appeals: Criminal Appeal No.27 of 2017 filed by the original accused (Manik, Mahesh, and Siddheshwar Mote) chal...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Summary Judgment for Return of Shares and Dividends in Commercial Suit — Plaintiff Stockbroker Entitled to 11,25,000 ITC Shares and Accrued Dividends After Full Satisfaction of Debt Under One Time Settlement. Court Holds That Once Debt Is Fully Satisfied, Bank Must Return All Pledged Securities and Cannot Retain Them as Collateral for Other Debts.

10 Mar 2025

The Plaintiff, Shrikant G. Mantri, a stockbroker and registered member of the Bombay Stock Exchange, filed a commercial suit against Punjab National B...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Quashes Order for Specimen Signature in Cheating Case — Section 311A Cr.P.C. Application After Charge Sheet Not Maintainable. Court holds that application under Section 311A Cr.P.C. for specimen handwriting can only be made during investigation, not after filing of charge sheet.

16 Dec 2021

The petitioner, Vinod Kumar, was an accused in Crime No.9/2020 registered at Yapaladinni Police Station for offences under Sections 420, 468, 470 and ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Writ Petition Challenging TDS Deduction on Interest Component of Motor Accident Compensation. Interest on compensation under Motor Vehicles Act is not 'income' and TDS cannot be deducted under Income Tax Act.

8 Feb 2023

The petitioner, Balkrishna Mhaske, through his wife Latabai, filed a writ petition challenging the deduction of Tax at Source (TDS) on the interest co...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim in Central Excise Duty Case — Limitation Period Applies Separately to Buyer. The Court held that the period of limitation of six months under Section 11B(1) of the Central Excise Act, 1944 applies to a buyer's refund claim even if the manufacturer paid duty under protest, as the rights of manufacturer and buyer are distinct.

20 Feb 2019

The case involves a batch of appeals by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the appellant/buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central excise dut...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore Hears Appeals by Telecom Companies Against Income Tax Department on TDS Liability. Multiple Appeals Filed Under Section 260-A of Income Tax Act, 1961 Challenging ITAT Orders for Assessment Years 2005-06 to 2008-09.

14 Aug 2014

The High Court of Karnataka at Bangalore heard a batch of Income Tax Appeals filed by telecom companies under Section 260-A of the Income Tax Act, 196...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Dismisses Buyer's Refund Claim for Excise Duty Paid Under Protest by Manufacturer — Limitation Period Under Section 11B(1) Applies Separately to Buyer. The right of the buyer to claim refund under Section 11B(2)(e) is distinct from the manufacturer's right, and the benefit of the second proviso (waiver of limitation for duty paid under protest) does not extend to the buyer.

20 Feb 2019

The Supreme Court dismissed a batch of appeals filed by Western Coalfields Ltd. (the buyer) against the rejection of its refund claim for central exci...

High Court

Bombay High Court Considers Election Petition Alleging Improper Rejection of Votes and Irregular Draw of Lots. Court Examines Whether Returning Officer Erroneously Invalidated Votes Under Section 100(1)(d)(iii) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951, and Whether Section 65 Overrides Rule 75(4) of the Conduct of Election Rules, 1961.

13 Jan 2015

The case involves an election petition filed under Section 81 read with Section 100(1)(d)(iii) and (iv) of the Representation of the People Act, 1951,...

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Allows Jaipur Municipal Corporation's Appeal in Conversion Charges Refund Case — Land Use Change Required Payment Under Section 173-A of Rajasthan Municipalities Act, 1959. Court Holds That Conversion Charges Were Validly Demanded and Respondents Not Entitled to Refund.

5 Aug 2019

The Supreme Court of India heard an appeal by the Jaipur Municipal Corporation against a Division Bench judgment of the Rajasthan High Court that dire...

High Court

High Court of Karnataka Allows Writ Petition Quashing Banking Ombudsman Order in Demand Draft Cancellation Dispute. Petitioner Entitled to Cancellation of DD and Credit of Amount with Interest as Per RBI Circulars.

25 Nov 2024

The petitioner, Doddaballapur Spinning Mills, a company registered under the Companies Act, 1956, held a current account with ICICI Bank Ltd. (respond...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)