Search Results for "civil suit challenging arbitration"

Trending :

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals by Acquiring Body in Land Acquisition Compensat...
Bombay High Court Dismisses NHAI Appeals in Land Acquisition Compensation Disput...
Bombay High Court Dismisses Writ Petition Challenging Concurrent Findings in Sui...
Bombay High Court at Goa Dismisses Review Petition in Partition Suit Impleadment...
Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Corruption Case Due to Unreliable Trap Witn...

Search Results for "civil suit challenging arbitration"

656 result(s) found

Home Search Results

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 656 result(s)

Supreme Court

Supreme Court Restores Suit in Family Partition Dispute, Sets Aside Rejection Under Order VII Rule 11 CPC.

10 Feb 2026

The Supreme Court set aside the rejection of a civil suit under Order VII Rule 11 CPC arising from a family partition dispute. The cas...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Settled Following Deed of Settlement — Compromise Agreement Not Void Despite Criminal Charges Being Non-Compoundable. The Court held that the settlement was a bona fide compromise of civil disputes and the withdrawal of criminal prosecution was a lawful consideration, not rendering the settlement void.

9 Apr 2019

The petitioner, Sushma B. Chandak, filed an arbitration petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging an arbitr...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Consent Award in Arbitration — Consent Terms Cannot Be Unilaterally Withdrawn After Being Acted Upon. Arbitrator Not Required to Deliver Signed Award Under Section 31(5) When Award Is Made in Terms of Consent Terms Under Section 30.

13 Jul 2017

The appellant, M/s. Pandi Devi Oil Private Limited, filed a petition under Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 challenging an arb...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Arbitration Petition as Time-Barred Under Section 34(3) of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Delay Beyond 30-Day Condonable Period Cannot Be Excused Even If Sufficient Cause Is Shown. The court held that the limitation period for setting aside an award is three months plus 30 days, and no further extension is permissible, rejecting the petition filed one day after the 30-day period.

2 Apr 2016

The applicant, M/s Tirumala Roadways, filed a notice of motion seeking condonation of 30 days delay in filing an arbitration petition under Section 34...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Execution of Arbitral Award — Jurisdiction Under Section 42 of Arbitration Act Determined by First Application. Court holds that once a Section 34 petition is filed in a court, that court alone has exclusive jurisdiction to entertain all subsequent applications including execution, regardless of withdrawal.

23 Feb 2015

The case involves an appeal against an order of a learned Single Judge of the Bombay High Court, which negated the appellant's contention that the cou...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Appeals Against Remand Order in Arbitration Matters — Single Judge Exceeded Jurisdiction Under Section 34 by Setting Aside Award and Remanding for Reconsideration Without Finding Award to Be Void or Inoperative. The Court Held That Section 34 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, Does Not Confer Power of Remand; Only Remedies Are to Uphold, Modify, or Set Aside the Award.

25 Jun 2013

The appellant, Geojit Financial Services Limited (now Geojit BNP Paribas Financial Services Limited), a stock broker registered with the National Stoc...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Challenge to Arbitrator's Interim Order in Copyright License Dispute — Balance of Convenience and Irreparable Loss Considered. The court upheld the arbitrator's order restraining the petitioner from exploiting films and directing delivery of materials, finding no perversity or jurisdictional error under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996.

30 Jan 2013

The petitioner, Moser Baer Entertainment Limited, filed a petition under Section 37(2)(b) of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, challenging a...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Motion to Set Aside Insolvency Notice Based on Arbitral Award — No Stay of Execution Exists. Pendency of appeal under Section 37 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 does not operate as stay unless specifically granted, and insolvency notice based on award not stayed is valid.

16 Oct 2012

The case involves a Notice of Motion taken out by Mr. Harshad Moorlidhar Shah, Judgment Debtor No. 3, to set aside Insolvency Notice No. N/19 of 2012 ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Dismisses Appeal Against Refusal of Interim Relief in Arbitration Dispute Over IPL Media Rights — No Prima Facie Case for Injunction Established Under Section 9 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996. The court held that the appellant failed to demonstrate a prima facie case for interim relief as the termination of media rights agreements by the respondent was within contractual rights.

23 Feb 2011

The appeal arose from a judgment and order dated December 20, 2010, passed by a learned single Judge of the Bombay High Court in Arbitration Petition ...

High Court

Bombay High Court Allows Arbitration Petition Under Section 11 of Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996 — Appointment of Arbitrator Despite Alleged Non-Signatory to Arbitration Agreement. Court Holds That a Party Can Be Referred to Arbitration If There Is Sufficient Prima Facie Evidence of Consent to Arbitrate, Including Through Conduct or Group Company Doctrine.

30 Nov -0001

The petitioner, Oil and Natural Gas Corporation Ltd. (ONGC), filed a petition under Section 11 of the Arbitration and Conciliation Act, 1996, seeking ...

23 24 25 26 27

Full Name * Username * Mobile Number * Email Address * State/UT * City * Password * Confirm Password * Referral Code (Optional)