Search Results for "Vendor Not Party"

717 result(s) found

Scroll Down To Discover

Found 717 result(s)

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

High Court Allows Writ Petition, Sets Aside Civil Judge's Order Rejecting Application for Judgment on Admission Under Order XII Rule 6 of CPC in Property Fraud Case Involving Forged Deeds and Impersonation

The Petitioner, filed a Writ Petition under Article 226 of the Constitution of India challenging the Civil Judge, Thane's order dated 12th September 2...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Acquits Accused in Rape Case Due to Inconsistent Evidence and Conduct. Conviction under Sections 366, 376(2)(f), 376(2)(n) IPC Set Aside as Prosecutrix's Testimony Found Unreliable and Conduct Inconsistent with Forcible Intercourse.

The appellant, Shailesh Mahadeo Lanjewar, was convicted by the Additional Sessions Judge, Chandrapur for offences under Sections 366, 376(2)(f) and 37...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Kerala High Court Upholds Trial Court's Grant of Half Share to Sister in Property Dispute Between Siblings. Power of Attorney Revoked by Implication When Principal Joins in Sale, Rendering Subsequent Sale by Agent Void as to Principal's Share.

The appellant, Thankamma George, and respondent No. 1, Lilly Thomas, are sisters who jointly purchased a property in 1991. The appellant, working abro...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Supreme Court Allows Suit Based on Adverse Possession — Overrules Earlier View That Adverse Possession Can Only Be Used as Shield. Plaintiff Who Has Perfected Title by Adverse Possession Can Sue for Declaration and Protection or Recovery of Possession.

The Supreme Court addressed the question whether a person claiming title by adverse possession can maintain a suit for declaration of title and for pr...

© Image Copyrights Juris Services & Technology

Bombay High Court Dismisses Petitions Challenging AAIFR Order Rejecting Revival Scheme for Sick Company Under SICA. The court held that the AAIFR's findings on non-compliance and lack of feasibility were based on evidence and not perverse, thus no interference under Article 226 was warranted.

This group of writ petitions challenges a common order dated 28/5/2010 passed by the Appellate Authority for Industrial and Financial Reconstruction (...